Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Development and Application of Seed Coating Agent for the Control of Major Soil-Borne Diseases Infecting Wheat

Xue-Xiang Ren; Chao Chen; Zheng-He Ye; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
37
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to reduce the usage amount of pesticide fertilizers and protect the natural environment, seed coating agents are receiving increased wide concern. In this study, the active constituent (pesticide) and inactive components (surfactants and film former) of the seed coating agents were screened and optimized by the wet sand processing superfine grinding method. The fungal inhibition test of pesticides showed that thifluzamide, fludioxonil, pyraclostrobin, and difenoconazole have an obvious fungal inhibitory effect on wheat sharp eyespot, take-all, and root rot. LAE-9 and polyacrylamide + carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is recommended for the safe surfactant and film former, respectively, based on the seed germination test. Moreover, 6% difenoconazole · fludioxonil flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC) stimulates the seedling growth of wheat, advances the growth of root, and improves biomass in the field trial, meanwhile, the control efficiency reached above 80%. Thus, we suggested it can be used as an effective seed coating agent for the control of soil-borne diseases in wheat. The seed coating agent has the characteristics of disease prevention, increasing crop yield, and safety of environment, which is of significance in practical application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four fungicides inhibited fungi associated with wheat diseases.

Treatment
thifluzamide, fludioxonil, pyraclostrobin, and difenoconazolee0
Outcome
fungal inhibitory effect on wheat sharp eyespot, take-all, and root rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thifluzamide, fludioxonil, pyraclostrobin, and difenoconazole have an obvious fungal inhibitory effect on wheat sharp eyespot, take-all, and root rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–571 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination tests supported LAE-9 as safe surfactant.

Treatment
LAE-9e0
Outcome
safe surfactante0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAE-9 and polyacrylamide + carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is recommended for the safe surfactant and film former, respectively, based on the seed germination test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination tests supported polyacrylamide plus CMC as safe film former.

Treatment
polyacrylamide + carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)e0
Outcome
film formere0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAE-9 and polyacrylamide + carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is recommended for the safe surfactant and film former, respectively, based on the seed germination test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6% coating stimulated wheat seedling and root growth and biomass.

Treatment
6% difenoconazole · fludioxonil flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC)e0
Outcome
seedling growth of wheat, advances the growth of root, and improves biomasse0
Direction
stimulatese0
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6% difenoconazole · fludioxonil flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC) stimulates the seedling growth of wheat, advances the growth of root, and improves biomass in the field trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating achieved disease control efficiency above 80%.

Treatment
6% difenoconazole · fludioxonil flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC)e0
Outcome
control efficiencye0
Value
above 80%e0
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6% difenoconazole · fludioxonil flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC) stimulates the seedling growth of wheat, advances the growth of root, and improves biomass in the field trial, meanwhile, the control efficiency reached above 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–984 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend the coating for wheat soil borne disease control.

Outcome
effective seed coating agent for the control of soil-borne diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it can be used as an effective seed coating agent for the control of soil-borne diseases in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1102 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fludioxonil · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fludioxonil · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

difenoconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.