Paper · 2015 · Agrochemicals

Development of Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agent and Its Control Effect on Wheat Sharp Eyespot

LI Hai-ya

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Aims] The aims were to prepare difenoconazole 3% water-retention slow release seed treatment agent.[Methods] The adjuvant was screened by the common methods.Field micro-plot experiment was conducted to determine the safety of the seed treatment agent on the wheat growth and the control effect on wheat sharp eyespot.[Results] The formula of difenoconazole 3% water-retention slow release seed treatment agent was difenoconazole 3%,super absorbent polymer 10%,NNO 12%,PVA-1788 4%,carclazyte 3%,xanthan gum 1%,rhodamine bextra 2% and white carbon black 65%.It was safe to wheat growth that 100 kg of wheat seed was dressed with 200 g of the seed treatment agent.At jointing stage and panicle stage,the control effects were 65.5 and 41.1%,respectively,which were both significantly higher than that of difenoconazole 3% FSC.The yield increasing rate was 26.5%.[Conclusions] Dressing with difenoconazole 3% water-retention slow release seed treatment agent was safe to wheat growth and the control effect on wheat sharp eyespot was high.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment was safe for wheat growth at 200 g per 100 kg seed.

Treatment
100 kg of wheat seed was dressed with 200 g of the seed treatment agente0
Outcome
safe to wheat growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was safe to wheat growth that 100 kg of wheat seed was dressed with 200 g of the seed treatment agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At jointing, sharp eyespot control was 65.5%, higher than difenoconazole 3% FSC.

Organ / stage
jointing stagee0
Treatment
Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agentt0
Outcome
control effectse0
Direction
highere0
Value
65.5e0
Comparator
difenoconazole 3% FSCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At jointing stage and panicle stage,the control effects were 65.5 and 41.1%,respectively,which were both significantly higher than that of difenoconazole 3% FSC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agent and Its Control Effect on Wheat Sharp Eyespot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At panicle stage, sharp eyespot control was 41.1%, higher than difenoconazole 3% FSC.

Organ / stage
panicle stagee0
Treatment
Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agentt0
Outcome
control effectse0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.1%e0
Comparator
difenoconazole 3% FSCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At jointing stage and panicle stage,the control effects were 65.5 and 41.1%,respectively,which were both significantly higher than that of difenoconazole 3% FSC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agent and Its Control Effect on Wheat Sharp Eyespot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat yield increase rate was 26.5%.

Treatment
Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agentt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
26.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increasing rate was 26.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Difenoconazole 3% Water-retention Slow Release Seed Treatment Agent and Its Control Effect on Wheat Sharp Eyespot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–128 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

difenoconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

seed treatment · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.