Paper · 2015 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

MAXIMIZING THE EFFECIENCY OF COMPOST RICE STRAW FOR POTATO PRODUCTION

A. Taha; G. Baddour; A. Mosa; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study is carried out under field conditions on a clay soil at the Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Agric. Mansoura Univ. during the winter season of 2012/2013 to study the combined effect of compost rice straw and bio fertilizers in the presence of ( Indole acetic acid ,Fulvic acid ,and Gibberellic acid) as foliar amendments on plant growth and tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum, L.) as well as chlorophyll content in the leaves, N, P and K concentrations in the leaves and tubers in addition to starch, Total soluble solids and nitrate content in tubers. Nine treatments were arranged in complete randomized block design with 3 replicates as follows; 1- Compost rice straw (CRS), 2- (CRS) + Indole acetic acid (IAA), 3- CRS+ Fulvic acid (F.A) , 4- CRS + Gibberellic acid (G.A). 5- (CRS) + Mixture of Azotobacter chrococcum and Bacillus circulans (Mix), 6- (CRS) + (Mix) + (IAA), 7-(CRS) + (Mix) + (F.A), 8-(CRS) + (Mix) + (G.A). Also, the recommended doses of N, P and K fertilizers for potato were put in consideration as a control treatment. Thus, the total numbers of treatment are 9 treatments. The obtained results can be summarized as follow: Spraying of foliar amendments either in a single form or in combination with bio fertilization led to a positive effect on the growth and yield of potato tuber. Fulvic acid were more effective for all the studied traits than other foliar amendments. The highest level of nitrate and trace elements were detected in potato tubers produced from the plants treated with the recommended of N, P and K fertilizers (control). While the lowest level produced from plants treated with fulvic acid+ the mix of bio fertilizers +CRS. Inoculation of potato tubers with the mixture of multi strains inoculants in combination with the studied foliar amendments and CRS gave a higher magnitude of plant growth, chemical composition, yield and its components as well as quality parameters of potato tuber. The results ensure the importance of partial replacement of chemical NPK fertilizers by the use of bio and organic ones in producing potatoes. Its application would reduce the consumption of chemical fertilizers which in turn reduce the production costs as well as decrease nitrate content in the tubers besides, saving the environment from chemical pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar amendments alone or with biofertilization positively affected potato growth and tuber yield.

Treatment
Spraying of foliar amendments either in a single form or in combination with bio fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth and yield of potato tubere0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of foliar amendments either in a single form or in combination with bio fertilization led to a positive effect on the growth and yield of potato tuber.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid was more effective than other foliar amendments across studied traits.

Treatment
Fulvic acide0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
other foliar amendmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fulvic acid were more effective for all the studied traits than other foliar amendments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended N, P and K fertilizers produced the highest nitrate and trace element levels in potato tubers.

Treatment
recommended of N, P and K fertilizerse0
Outcome
highest level of nitrate and trace elementse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of nitrate and trace elements were detected in potato tubers produced from the plants treated with the recommended of N, P and K fertilizers (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid, mixed biofertilizers and compost rice straw produced the lowest nitrate and trace element levels in potato tubers.

Treatment
fulvic acid+ the mix of bio fertilizers +CRSe0
Outcome
lowest levele0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the lowest level produced from plants treated with fulvic acid+ the mix of bio fertilizers +CRS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculants, foliar amendments and compost rice straw increased potato growth, composition, yield and quality.

Treatment
Inoculation of potato tubers with the mixture of multi strains inoculants in combination with the studied foliar amendments and CRSe0
Outcome
plant growth, chemical composition, yield and its components as well as quality parameters of potato tubere0
Direction
higher magnitudee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of potato tubers with the mixture of multi strains inoculants in combination with the studied foliar amendments and CRS gave a higher magnitude of plant growth, chemical composition, yield and its components as well as quality parameters of potato tuber.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1975 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended partial replacement of chemical NPK fertilizers by bio and organic fertilizers for potato production.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Outcome
partial replacement of chemical NPK fertilizers by the use of bio and organic onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results ensure the importance of partial replacement of chemical NPK fertilizers by the use of bio and organic ones in producing potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2118 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

other · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 24 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.