Paper · 1998 · Compost Science & Utilization

Growth, Yield and Nutrition of Potato in Fumigated or Nonfumigated Soil Amended with Spent Mushroom Compost and Straw Mulch

M.P.N. Gent; W.H. Elmer; K.A. Stoner; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four cultural amendments; spent mushroom compost, straw mulch, both compost and straw mulch, or neither, were applied to soils that were either fumigated or not fumigated in a field of potatoes subject to early dying and Colorado potato beetle defoliation. Two plant samples were harvested at two week intervals to measure shoot and tuber growth and mineral nutrition, and two rows were harvested for yield at maturity. Amending the soil with compost increased vegetative growth and shoot weight more than final yield of tubers. Compost amendment delayed tuber filling by several days. Fumigation partly controlled the loss of leaf area due to early dying, but it did not increase tuber yields, and in 1994 fumigation reduced tuber yield in compost amended soils. The effects of compost and straw mulch on tuber yield were related to the concentrations of N and P in leaves. The potato crop did not benefit from compost amendment combined with fumigation, because in fumigated soil there was no improvement in plant nutrition due to compost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased potato vegetative growth and shoot weight more than final tuber yield.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
vegetative growth and shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
final yield of tuberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Amending the soil with compost increased vegetative growth and shoot weight more than final yield of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost delayed tuber filling by several days.

Treatment
Compost amendmente0
Outcome
tuber fillinge0
Direction
delayede0
Value
several dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compost amendment delayed tuber filling by several days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation partly controlled potato leaf-area loss due to early dying.

Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
loss of leaf area due to early dyinge0
Direction
partly controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fumigation partly controlled the loss of leaf area due to early dying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not increase potato tuber yields.

Treatment
Fumigatione1
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“it did not increase tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigation partly controlled the loss of leaf area due to early dying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1994, fumigation reduced potato tuber yield in compost amended soils.

Treatment
fumigatione0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1994e0
Setting
compost amended soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato in Fumigated or Nonfumigated Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 1994 fumigation reduced tuber yield in compost amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–762 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and straw mulch effects on tuber yield were related to leaf N and P concentrations.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
compost and straw mulche0
Compound
N and Pe0
Outcome
tuber yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effects of compost and straw mulch on tuber yield were related to the concentrations of N and P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost did not improve potato nutrition in fumigated soil.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
plant nutritione0
Direction
no improvemente0
Setting
fumigated soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“in fumigated soil there was no improvement in plant nutrition due to compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1040 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

solarization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

solarization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 97 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 122 positive, 18 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 394 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.