Paper · 2013 · Annals of biological research

Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of sunflower(Helianthus annus L.)

Moslem Fetri; Mohammad-Eghbal Ghobadi; Ghassem Asadian; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

High yields of grain and sunflower oil need to match of vegetative and reproductive growth stages of the plant with favorable weather conditions by selecting appropriate sowing date. A split plot experiment, according a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was performed in the research field of Scientific and Practical Center, Education Complex of Jahad-Agriculture of Hamedan, Iran in 2012. Main plot were sowing date (20 May, 5 and 20 June) and sub-plots were six sunflower cultivars (Pomar, Euroflor, Master, Sirna, Azargol and Armaviruski). Results showed that between cultivars, was significant for grain yield, biological yield, head diameter, stem diameter, stem height, grain empty percent, head dry weight, dry weight of stems and leaves. Grain yield of Euroflor (556.3 g m-2) was the most of the other varieties. The superiority of this variety was due to increased diameter and dry weight of head, stem diameter and biomass. Study planting dates showed that between cultivars was no significant for grain yield, but with delayed planting, decreased stem diameter. The effect of sowing date was significant difference for thousand-grain weight and number of grains per head, so that delays in planting increased grain weight. That was due to reduced number of grains per head.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower cultivars differed significantly in grain yield, biological yield and head diameter.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
grain yield, biological yield, head diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that between cultivars, was significant for grain yield, biological yield, head diameter, stem diameter, stem height, grain empty percent, head dry weight, dry weight of stems and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower cultivars differed significantly in stem diameter, stem height and grain empty percent.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
stem diameter, stem height, grain empty percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that between cultivars, was significant for grain yield, biological yield, head diameter, stem diameter, stem height, grain empty percent, head dry weight, dry weight of stems and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower cultivars differed significantly in head dry weight and dry weight of stems and leaves.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
head dry weight, dry weight of stems and leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that between cultivars, was significant for grain yield, biological yield, head diameter, stem diameter, stem height, grain empty percent, head dry weight, dry weight of stems and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Euroflor had the greatest grain yield at 556.3 g m-2.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
Euroflore0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
moste0
Value
556.3 g m-2e0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of Euroflor (556.3 g m-2) was the most of the other varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Euroflor superiority was attributed to increased head diameter and dry weight, stem diameter and biomass.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
Euroflore1
Outcome
superiority of this varietye0
Qualifier
increased diameter and dry weight of head, stem diameter and biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The superiority of this variety was due to increased diameter and dry weight of head, stem diameter and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of Euroflor (556.3 g m-2) was the most of the other varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting dates did not differ significantly in grain yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Comparator
20 May, 5 and 20 Junee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Study planting dates showed that between cultivars was no significant for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Main plot were sowing date (20 May, 5 and 20 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting decreased stem diameter.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
delayed plantinge0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
20 Maye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with delayed planting, decreased stem diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Main plot were sowing date (20 May, 5 and 20 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected thousand-grain weight, with planting delays increasing grain weight.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
delays in plantinge0
Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
20 Maye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of sowing date was significant difference for thousand-grain weight and number of grains per head, so that delays in planting increased grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Main plot were sowing date (20 May, 5 and 20 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected grains per head, with delays reducing their number.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
delays in plantinge0
Outcome
number of grains per heade0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
20 Maye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of sowing date was significant difference for thousand-grain weight and number of grains per head, so that delays in planting increased grain weight. That was due to reduced number of grains per head.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1315 · show in text ↑
e1

“Main plot were sowing date (20 May, 5 and 20 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sowing time · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.