Paper · 1986 · Weed Science

Metribuzin and Chlorsulfuron Effect on Grain of Treated Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Randy L. Anderson

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to determine the influence of metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4 H )-one] and/or chlorsulfuron {2-chloro- N -[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl)benzenesulfonamide} on germination, coleoptile growth, and mineral accumulation of seed from treated parent plants. The herbicides were applied postemergence in the spring to ‘Vona’ and ‘Centurk’ winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). The rate of metribuzin was 360 g ai/ha, with chlorsulfuron applied at 18, 35, or 70 g/ha. Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties approximately 40%, whereas chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of only Vona. Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide, but metribuzin, when applied alone, reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed. The addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated this growth reduction. The mineral concentration of the seed of both varieties indicated that metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed by the parent plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties by approximately 40%

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Metribuzine0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties approximately 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of Vona only

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Vonae1
Treatment
chlorsulfuron at the higher ratese1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of only Vona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
either herbicidee2
Outcome
Seed germinatione2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin applied alone reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Vonae3
Organ / stage
seede3
Treatment
metribuzine3
Outcome
coleoptile growthe3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“metribuzin, when applied alone, reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated the coleoptile growth reduction

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzine4
Outcome
growth reductione4
Direction
eliminatede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“The addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated this growth reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
metribuzin and chlorsulfurone5
Outcome
mineral translocation to the seede5
Direction
did not affecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1065 · show in text ↑

chlorsulfuron · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 12 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

metribuzin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

chlorsulfuron · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.