Abstract
Response of weeds and sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L. ‘Mono Hy D2′) to preplanting treatments of mixtures of cycloate ( S -ethyl N -ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) and ethofumesate [(±)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] was evaluated in five field studies. A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%. The response of weeds to preplanting applications of mixtures of cycloate and ethofumesate was independent of soil texture, whereas response of sugarbeets was dependent on soil texture. The herbicide mixtures significantly reduced the pre-thinning stand of sugarbeets and root and sucrose yields on two sandy loams, but not on a clay loam.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate and ethofumesate mixture reduced common lambsquarters stand by 90%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicidee0
- Interactor
- common lambsquarters
Chenopodium albume0weed - Outcome
- stand of common lambsquarterse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 90%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate and ethofumesate mixture reduced green foxtail stand by 97 to 99%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicidee0
- Interactor
- green foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- green foxtaile0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 97 to 99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate and ethofumesate mixture reduced yellow foxtail stand by 97 to 99%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicidee0
- Interactor
- yellow foxtail
Setaria pumilae0weed - Outcome
- yellow foxtaile0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 97 to 99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate and ethofumesate mixture reduced kochia stand by 64 to 77%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicidee0
- Outcome
- kochiae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 64 to 77%e0
BassiaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate and ethofumesate mixture reduced redroot pigweed stand by 82 to 99%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicidee0
- Interactor
- redroot pigweede0weed
- Outcome
- redroot pigweede0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 82 to 99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A mixture containing 1.7 kg/ha of each herbicide reduced the stand of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.) 90%, green foxtail [ Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [ Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] 97 to 99%, kochia [ Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] 64 to 77%, and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) 82 to 99%”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed response to the mixtures was independent of soil texture.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- mixtures of cycloate and ethofumesatee0
- Outcome
- response of weedse0
- Direction
- independente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The response of weeds to preplanting applications of mixtures of cycloate and ethofumesate was independent of soil texture”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarbeet response to the mixtures depended on soil texture.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Outcome
- response of sugarbeetse0
- Direction
- dependente0
- Setting
- soil texturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of sugarbeets was dependent on soil texture”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixtures reduced sugarbeet pre-thinning stand on two sandy loams but not clay loam.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- herbicide mixturese0
- Outcome
- pre-thinning stande0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- clay loame0
- Setting
- two sandy loamse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The herbicide mixtures significantly reduced the pre-thinning stand of sugarbeets and root and sucrose yields on two sandy loams, but not on a clay loam”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixtures reduced sugarbeet root and sucrose yields on two sandy loams but not clay loam.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- herbicide mixturese0
- Outcome
- root and sucrose yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- clay loame0
- Setting
- two sandy loamse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The herbicide mixtures significantly reduced the pre-thinning stand of sugarbeets and root and sucrose yields on two sandy loams, but not on a clay loam”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →herbicide · Bassia · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
herbicide · Chenopodium album · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.