Paper · 2026 · Weed Technology

Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States

Abraham Akuoko; Andrew Kniss; Joel Felix; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract No effective preemergence or postemergence herbicides are currently available to use on sugar beets for managing kochia and Palmer amaranth that are resistant to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase. To evaluate a new herbicide option, field experiments were conducted to assess the efficacy of a preemergence application of metamitron to sugar beet crops. Studies were carried out in Lingle, Wyoming, and Scottsbluff, Nebraska, in 2019. Studies were repeated in 2020 at the Scottsbluff location, and two locations in Oregon, Nyssa and Ontario. Cycloate (4.03 kg ai ha −1 ), ethofumesate (1.58 kg ai ha −1 ), metamitron (2.82, 5.63, and 7 kg ai ha −1 ), and metamitron + ethofumesate (5.63 + 1.58 kg ai ha −1 ) were applied preemergence. Metamitron (5.63 kg ai ha −1 ) + ethofumesate (1.58 kg ai ha −1 ) was applied preemergence followed by (fb) ethofumesate (1.58 kg ai ha −1 ) or acetochlor (1.26 kg ai ha −1 ) applied at the 2 to 4 true-leaf (TL) stage of sugar beet, ethofumesate or acetochlor at the 2 to 4 TL and 6 to 8 TL stages, and ethofumesate fb acetochlor at the 2 to 4 TL and 6 to 8 TL stages, respectively. A nontreated control and weed-free check (glyphosate applied at 2 to 4 TL and 6 to 8 TL stages of sugar beet) were included for treatment comparison. Ethofumesate applied alone preemergence provided ≤65% control of Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweed relative to ≥95% control when metamitron (5.63 kg ai ha −1 ) was applied as a tank mixture partner. Any treatment containing metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1 ) provided ≥80% control of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and Palmer amaranth, but not kochia. When kochia was not present, any herbicide combination that contained metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1 ) provided similar sugar beet root yield and recoverable sugar as glyphosate-based treatments. Based on the findings of this research, metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1 ) applied preemergence will control Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweed until other herbicides, such as those that inhibit very-long-chain fatty acids, can be applied at the 2 TL stage of sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethofumesate applied alone preemergence gave lower weed control than metamitron tank-mixed with it.

Treatment
Ethofumesate applied alone preemergencee1
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Second interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranthe1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
≤65%e1
Qualifier
redroot pigweede1
Comparator
metamitron (5.63 kg ai ha −1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · Second interactorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethofumesate applied alone preemergence provided ≤65% control of Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweed relative to ≥95% control when metamitron (5.63 kg ai ha −1) was applied as a tank mixture partner”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1280–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metamitron at 5.63 kg ai ha −1 or more gave at least 80% control of common lambsquarters and Palmer amaranth.

Treatment
metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1)e2
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume2weed
Second interactor
Palmer amaranthe2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
providede2
Value
≥80%e2
Qualifier
redroot pigweede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“Any treatment containing metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1) provided ≥80% control of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and Palmer amaranth, but not kochia”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1504–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metamitron at 5.63 kg ai ha −1 or more did not control kochia.

Treatment
metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1)e2
Interactor
kochiaBassiae2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
note2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“Any treatment containing metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1) provided ≥80% control of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and Palmer amaranth, but not kochia”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1504–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Where kochia was absent, metamitron-containing herbicide combinations gave similar sugar beet root yield and recoverable sugar to glyphosate-based treatments.

Treatment
herbicide combination that contained metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1)e3
Outcome
sugar beet root yield and recoverable sugare3
Direction
similare3
Qualifier
When kochia was not presente3
Comparator
glyphosate-based treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“When kochia was not present, any herbicide combination that contained metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1) provided similar sugar beet root yield and recoverable sugar as glyphosate-based treatments”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1662–1855 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Metamitron at 5.63 kg ai ha −1 or more applied preemergence is recommended to control Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweed until later herbicides can be applied.

Treatment
metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1) applied preemergencee4
Outcome
Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of preemergence-applied metamitron to sugar beet in the western United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“metamitron (≥5.63 kg ai ha −1) applied preemergence will control Palmer amaranth, common lambsquarters, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1897–2021 · show in text ↑

ethofumesate · control · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metamitron · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

metamitron · Chenopodium album · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · control · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 39 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.