Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the time of occurrence of the emergence, budding, fruiting and seed shedding stages, as well as the degree of advancement of the white goosefoot fruiting and diaspores shedding stages in fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean crops under mechanical and chemical weed control. Phenological observations were conducted in the years 2000-2002 at 10-day intervals, starting from the day of crop sowing on alluvial soil made of light loam. Chemically weed controlled objects were treated with herbicides: fodder beet - lenacil 80%; spring wheat - MCPA 30% + dicamba 4%; faba bean - linuron 50%. It was proven that the times of occurrence and the scale of the studied phenological stages of white goosefoot depended on the crop species, the in-crop weed control method and the pattern of weather conditions in the study years. White goosefoot had the most favourable conditions of growth in the fodder beet crop. The herbicides in the fodder beet and faba bean crops delayed the emergence and the time of occurrence of successive white goosefoot growth stages. These agents also decreased the degree of diaspores shedding by the weed species studied. The most white goosefoot specimens shed fruits on the mechanically weed controlled plots. The diaspores dissemination was promoted by a warm and moist growing season.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
White goosefoot phenological timing and scale depended on crop species, weed control and weather.
- Taxon
- fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean cropst0
- Treatment
- in-crop weed control methode0
- Interactor
- white goosefoot
Chenopodium albume0weed - Outcome
- phenological stages of white goosefoote0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the times of occurrence and the scale of the studied phenological stages of white goosefoot depended on the crop species, the in-crop weed control method and the pattern of weather conditions”
t0“fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean crops”
Claim · model-written summary
White goosefoot grew most favorably in fodder beet.
- Taxon
- fodder beete0
- Interactor
- White goosefootChenopodium albume0weed
- Outcome
- most favourable conditions of growthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“White goosefoot had the most favourable conditions of growth in the fodder beet crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides delayed white goosefoot emergence and subsequent growth stages in fodder beet and faba bean.
- Taxon
- fodder beet and faba beane0
- Treatment
- herbicidese0
- Interactor
- white goosefootChenopodium albume0weed
- Outcome
- emergence and the time of occurrence of successive white goosefoot growth stagese0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The herbicides in the fodder beet and faba bean crops delayed the emergence and the time of occurrence of successive white goosefoot growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
The most white goosefoot plants shed fruits under mechanical weed control.
- Taxon
- fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean cropst0
- Treatment
- mechanically weed controllede0
- Interactor
- white goosefootChenopodium albume0weed
- Outcome
- white goosefoot specimens shed fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most white goosefoot specimens shed fruits on the mechanically weed controlled plots”
t0“fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Warm, moist growing seasons promoted white goosefoot diaspore dissemination.
- Taxon
- fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean cropst0
- Interactor
- Chenopodium album L.Chenopodium albumt0weed
- Outcome
- diaspores disseminatione0
- Direction
- promotede0
- Setting
- warm and moist growing seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The diaspores dissemination was promoted by a warm and moist growing season”
t0“Chenopodium album L. phenology in fodder beet, spring wheat and faba bean crops”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · Chenopodium album · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.