Paper · 1973 · Weed Science

Control of Kochia in Sugarbeets with 3′-Hydroxypropionanilide Isopropylcarbamate

E. E. Schweizer

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

When the mixture of 3.4 kg/ha of S -ethyl N -ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate (cycloate) plus 1.1 kg/ha of 3′-hydroxypropionanilide isopropylcarbamate (R 11913) was applied to three soils before planting sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.), the average stand of kochia ( Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) was reduced by 89% as compared to 9% with the standard rate of 4.5 kg/ha of cycloate. The competition of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and kochia was nearly eliminated throughout the growing season by a combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergence. This combination of treatments minimized competition from weeds all season, and the yield of sucrose was within 8% of that of the handweeded plots. Residues of the mixture of cycloate plus R 11913 were not detected biologically in two soils 8 months following application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cycloate and R 11913 mixture reduced kochia stand by 89%, compared with 9% under standard cycloate.

Treatment
mixture of 3.4 kg/ha of S -ethyl N -ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate (cycloate) plus 1.1 kg/ha of 3′-hydroxypropionanilide isopropylcarbamate (R 11913)e0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
stand of kochiae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
9%e0
Comparator
standard rate of 4.5 kg/ha of cycloatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the mixture of 3.4 kg/ha of S -ethyl N -ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate (cycloate) plus 1.1 kg/ha of 3′-hydroxypropionanilide isopropylcarbamate (R 11913) was applied to three soils before planting sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.), the average stand of kochia ( Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) was reduced by 89% as compared to 9% with the standard rate of 4.5 kg/ha of cycloate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined preplant and postemergence herbicides nearly eliminated foxtail millet competition.

Treatment
combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergencee0
Interactor
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0weed
Outcome
competition of foxtail millete0
Direction
nearly eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Setaria italica
Setaria italica · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The competition of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and kochia was nearly eliminated throughout the growing season by a combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide combination nearly eliminated redroot pigweed competition.

Treatment
combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergencee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
competition of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweede0
Direction
nearly eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The competition of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and kochia was nearly eliminated throughout the growing season by a combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide combination nearly eliminated kochia competition.

Treatment
combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergencee0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
kochiae0
Direction
nearly eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The competition of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and kochia was nearly eliminated throughout the growing season by a combination of 3.4 kg/ha of cycloate plus 1.1 kg/ha of R 11913 applied preplanting and 0.84 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) applied postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose yield with the combination was within 8% of handweeded plots.

Treatment
This combination of treatmentse0
Outcome
yield of sucrosee0
Direction
withine0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
handweeded plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combination of treatments minimized competition from weeds all season, and the yield of sucrose was within 8% of that of the handweeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residues of the cycloate and R 11913 mixture were not detected in two soils after eight months.

Outcome
Residues of the mixture of cycloate plus R 11913 were not detected biologicallye0
Qualifier
8 months following applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Residues of the mixture of cycloate plus R 11913 were not detected biologically in two soils 8 months following application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1019 · show in text ↑

phenmedipham · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

phenmedipham · Setaria italica · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Phenmedipham controlled foxtail millet better than the two analogues.

    Response of Sugarbeets and Weeds to Phenmedipham and Two Analogues · 1971 · compared with 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate

    Same directionCited by this paper

See all 2 papers →

phenmedipham · Bassia · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · Bassia · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.