Paper · 2019 · Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center

Effect of some insecticides alone and in combination with salicylic acid against aphid, Aphis gossypii, and whitefly Bemisia tabaci on the cotton field

Abd El-Hakeem El-Dmerdash El-Sherbeni; Mohamed Sengab Khaleid; Sabry Abd El All AbdAllah; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is one of the most important industrial crops in Egypt and worldwide. During its growth stages, cotton is threatened by several pests including aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover) and whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) which lead to deleterious effects on cotton growth, yield, and quality. Due to health and environmental hazards of pesticides, it is important to reduce them by using eco-friendly alternatives. Two field experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of some insecticides including profenofos (Prf), cyhalothrin (Cyh), and imidacloprid (Imd) individually or in combination with salicylic acid (SA) against cotton aphids and whiteflies. All spray treatments had potent and moderated effects against aphids and whiteflies, respectively. The Prf insecticide at 100% of the recommended dose was the most effective one against both pests followed by the Cyh. The insecticidal effect of SA against the tested pests was concentration dependent. The most effective combination treatments were Prf at 75% of recommended dose + SA at a concentration of 1 mM for aphids (reduction % 95.68), and Cyh at 75% of recommended dose + SA (0.5 mM) for whiteflies (reduction of 88.00%). All tested insecticides, individually or in combination with SA, significantly increased total phenolic (TP) content in treated plants compared with control. The maximum increase in TP content was recorded in cotton plants treated with Prf in combination with SA. Salicylic acid enhanced the effectiveness of the used insecticides, and thus, SA could be used to lower the amount of insecticides with increasing insecticidal efficacy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays had potent effects against aphids.

Treatment
spray treatmentse0
Outcome
aphidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All spray treatments had potent and moderated effects against aphids and whiteflies, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays had moderate effects against whiteflies.

Treatment
spray treatmentse0
Outcome
whitefliese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All spray treatments had potent and moderated effects against aphids and whiteflies, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prf at the full recommended dose was most effective against both pests.

Treatment
Prf insecticide at 100% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
both pestse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
Cyhe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Prf insecticide at 100% of the recommended dose was the most effective one against both pests followed by the Cyh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid effects on pests varied with concentration.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
insecticidal effecte0
Qualifier
concentration dependente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticidal effect of SA against the tested pests was concentration dependent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prf at 75% plus 1 mM SA reduced aphids by 95.68%.

Treatment
Prf at 75% of recommended dose + SA at a concentration of 1 mMe0
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prf at 75% of recommended dose + SA at a concentration of 1 mM for aphids (reduction % 95.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyh at 75% plus 0.5 mM SA reduced whiteflies by 88%.

Treatment
Cyh at 75% of recommended dose + SA (0.5 mM)e0
Outcome
whitefliese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
88.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyh at 75% of recommended dose + SA (0.5 mM) for whiteflies (reduction of 88.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticides with or without SA significantly increased cotton total phenolics.

Treatment
All tested insecticides, individually or in combination with SAe0
Outcome
total phenolic (TP) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested insecticides, individually or in combination with SA, significantly increased total phenolic (TP) content in treated plants compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prf combined with SA gave the maximum increase in cotton total phenolics.

Treatment
Prf in combination with SAe0
Outcome
TP contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum increase in TP content was recorded in cotton plants treated with Prf in combination with SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1452 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend SA to reduce insecticide amount while increasing efficacy.

Outcome
lower the amount of insecticides with increasing insecticidal efficacye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA could be used to lower the amount of insecticides with increasing insecticidal efficacy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–151 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

application · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 36 positive, 13 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.