Paper · 2021 · Plant Direct

Tomato and cotton G protein beta subunit mutants display constitutive autoimmune responses

Thi Thao Ninh; Wei Gao; Yuri Trusov; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Heterotrimeric G protein Gβ‐deficient mutants in rice and maize display constitutive immune responses, whereas Arabidopsis Gβ mutants show impaired defense, suggesting the existence of functional differences between monocots and dicots. Using CRISPR/Cas9, we produced one hemizygous tomato line with a mutated SlGB1 Gβ gene. Homozygous slgb1 knockout mutants exhibit all the hallmarks of autoimmune mutants, including development of necrotic lesions, constitutive expression of defense‐related genes, and high endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen species, resulting in early seedling lethality. Virus‐induced silencing of Gβ in cotton reproduced the symptoms observed in tomato mutants, confirming that the autoimmune phenotype is not limited to monocot species but is also shared by dicots. Even though multiple genes involved in SA and ethylene signaling are highly induced by Gβ silencing in tomato and cotton, co‐silencing of SA or ethylene signaling components in cotton failed to suppress the lethal phenotype, whereas co‐silencing of the oxidative burst oxidase RbohD can repress lethality. Despite the autoimmune response observed in slgb1 mutants, we show that SlGB1 is a positive regulator of the pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP)‐triggered immunity (PTI) response in tomato. We speculate that the phenotypic differences observed between Arabidopsis and tomato/cotton/rice/maize Gβ knockouts do not necessarily reflect divergences in G protein‐mediated defense mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Homozygous tomato slgb1 mutants developed necrotic lesions and early seedling lethality.

Material
slgb1 knockout mutantse0
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Homozygous slgb1 knockout mutants exhibit all the hallmarks of autoimmune mutants, including development of necrotic lesions, constitutive expression of defense‐related genes, and high endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen species, resulting in early seedling lethality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato slgb1 mutants constitutively expressed defense genes.

Gene
defense‐related genese0
Outcome
constitutive expression of defense‐related genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutive expression of defense‐related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato slgb1 mutants accumulated salicylic acid and reactive oxygen species.

Outcome
high endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gβ silencing in cotton reproduced tomato autoimmune symptoms.

Treatment
Virus‐induced silencing of Gβe0
Gene
Gβe0
Outcome
symptomse0
Comparator
tomato mutantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus‐induced silencing of Gβ in cotton reproduced the symptoms observed in tomato mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gβ silencing strongly induced SA and ethylene signaling genes in tomato and cotton.

Treatment
Gβ silencinge0
Outcome
genes involved in SA and ethylene signalinge0
Direction
highly inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiple genes involved in SA and ethylene signaling are highly induced by Gβ silencing in tomato and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton SA or ethylene component co-silencing failed to suppress lethality.

Treatment
co‐silencing of SA or ethylene signaling componentse0
Outcome
lethal phenotypee0
Direction
failed to suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co‐silencing of SA or ethylene signaling components in cotton failed to suppress the lethal phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RbohD co-silencing repressed lethality in cotton.

Treatment
co‐silencing of the oxidative burst oxidase RbohDe0
Gene
RbohDe0
Outcome
lethalitye0
Direction
represse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co‐silencing of the oxidative burst oxidase RbohD can repress lethality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlGB1 positively regulated PAMP-triggered immunity in tomato.

Gene
SlGB1e0
Outcome
pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP)‐triggered immunity (PTI) responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlGB1 is a positive regulator of the pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP)‐triggered immunity (PTI) response in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1328 · show in text ↑

ethene · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.