Abstract
The study was carried out by KVK during 2007-2010 with the help of farmers in the presence of concerning SMS at Sehore district under Vindhyan plateau agro climatic zone of Madhya Pradesh During these years of study on area 20 ha was covered under package demonstration on pigeonpea against their own problems with the number of 52 farmers is benefited under its technology. Maximum average yield, net return and minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage 11.5 q/ha, Rs 16700/ha and 29.3% &37.2 respectively was obtained under scientific technology compared to farmers practices 8.4 q/ha and Rs 9587 and higher wilt incidence 41.2% and pod borer damage 79%. With its positive effect on yield attributes i.e highest number of pod /plant (82), number of grain/pod (3.2),Test weight (83g) and grain yield (11.5 q/ha), was observed under balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatment compared to farmers conventional practices number of pod /plant (73), number of grain/pod (2.7),Test weight (78g) and grain yield (8.5 q/ha). The maximum average cost benefit ratio was obtained 1:2.2 under improved technology compared to farmers’ technology1: 1.7. Favorable cost benefit ratio is self explanatory of economic viability of the demonstration and convinced the farmers for adoption of intervention imparted. The technology suitable for enhancing the productivity of pigeon pea crop. and calls for conducting of such demonstrations under the transfer of technology programme by KVKs or other TOT centers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Scientific technology increased pigeonpea yield to 11.5 q/ha versus 8.4 q/ha under farmer practice.
- Taxon
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- scientific technologye0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 11.5 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 8.4 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average yield, net return and minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage 11.5 q/ha, Rs 16700/ha and 29.3% &37.2 respectively was obtained under scientific technology compared to farmers practices 8.4 q/ha”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Scientific technology raised net return to Rs 16700/ha from Rs 9587.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- scientific technologye0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- Maximume1
- Value
- Rs 16700/hae0
- Qualifier
- Rs 9587e0
- Comparator
- farmers practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return and minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage 11.5 q/ha, Rs 16700/ha and 29.3% &37.2 respectively was obtained under scientific technology compared to farmers practices 8.4 q/ha and Rs 9587”
e1“Maximum average yield, net return and minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Scientific technology reduced wilt incidence to 29.3% versus 41.2%.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- scientific technologye0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- minimizee0
- Value
- 29.3%e0
- Qualifier
- 41.2%e0
- Comparator
- farmers practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage 11.5 q/ha, Rs 16700/ha and 29.3% &37.2 respectively was obtained under scientific technology compared to farmers practices 8.4 q/ha and Rs 9587 and higher wilt incidence 41.2%”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Scientific technology reduced pod borer damage to 37.2 versus 79%.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- scientific technologye0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod borer damagee0
- Direction
- minimizee0
- Value
- 37.2e0
- Qualifier
- 79%e0
- Comparator
- farmers practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimize wilt incidence and pod borer damage 11.5 q/ha, Rs 16700/ha and 29.3% &37.2 respectively was obtained under scientific technology compared to farmers practices 8.4 q/ha and Rs 9587 and higher wilt incidence 41.2% and pod borer damage 79%”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Balanced fertilizer and dual inoculation raised pod number to 82 versus 73 per plant.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of pod /plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 82e0
- Qualifier
- 73e0
- Comparator
- farmers conventional practicese0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest number of pod /plant (82), number of grain/pod (3.2),Test weight (83g) and grain yield (11.5 q/ha), was observed under balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatment compared to farmers conventional practices number of pod /plant (73)”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The improved treatment raised grains per pod to 3.2 versus 2.7.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of grain/pode0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 3.2e0
- Qualifier
- 2.7e0
- Comparator
- farmers conventional practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of grain/pod (3.2),Test weight (83g) and grain yield (11.5 q/ha), was observed under balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatment compared to farmers conventional practices number of pod /plant (73), number of grain/pod (2.7)”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The improved treatment raised test weight to 83g versus 78g.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- Test weighte0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 83ge0
- Qualifier
- 78ge0
- Comparator
- farmers conventional practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Test weight (83g) and grain yield (11.5 q/ha), was observed under balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatment compared to farmers conventional practices number of pod /plant (73), number of grain/pod (2.7),Test weight (78g)”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The improved treatment raised grain yield to 11.5 q/ha versus 8.5 q/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 11.5 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 8.5 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers conventional practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (11.5 q/ha), was observed under balance dose of fertilizers with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB @ 10g/ kg as seed treatment compared to farmers conventional practices number of pod /plant (73), number of grain/pod (2.7),Test weight (78g) and grain yield (8.5 q/ha)”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology increased the cost benefit ratio to 1:2.2 versus 1: 1.7.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- improved technologye0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1:2.2e0
- Qualifier
- 1: 1.7e0
- Comparator
- farmers’ technologye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum average cost benefit ratio was obtained 1:2.2 under improved technology compared to farmers’ technology1: 1.7”
t0“pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended technology demonstrations for pigeon pea productivity.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
- Outcome
- conducting of such demonstrations under the transfer of technology programmee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The technology suitable for enhancing the productivity of pigeon pea crop. and calls for conducting of such demonstrations under the transfer of technology programme by KVKs or other TOT centers”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →Rhizobium · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
seed treatment · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →inoculation · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
seed treatment · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.