Abstract
Two consecutive field experiments were carried out at Taunggyi in winter and summer seasons, during the period of September 2015 to June 2016 to evaluate the infestation of diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage between the two practices (intercropping and insecticide spraying). A field trial was set up in 4 x 2 factorial arrangements with four replications. Factor (A) ; sole cabbage (C), cabbage intercropped with tomato (C+T), cabbage intercropped with chilli (C+ Chi) and cabbage intercropped with wild radish (C+WR) and factor (B); insecticide (I) and no insecticide (I0) were set up. The results showed that intercropping cabbage with tomato and chilli could reduce the DBM larva population significantly in both seasons. Insecticide (acephate) application has no significant impact on DBM infestation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage intercropped with tomato significantly reduced diamondback moth larval populations in both seasons.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- intercropping cabbage with tomatoe0
- Interactor
- DBMe0pest
- Outcome
- DBM larva populatione0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- sole cabbagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping cabbage with tomato and chilli could reduce the DBM larva population significantly in both seasons”
e1“sole cabbage (C), cabbage intercropped with tomato (C+T)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage intercropped with chilli significantly reduced diamondback moth larval populations in both seasons.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- intercropping cabbage with tomato and chillie0
- Interactor
- DBMe0pest
- Outcome
- DBM larva populatione0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- sole cabbagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping cabbage with tomato and chilli could reduce the DBM larva population significantly in both seasons”
e1“sole cabbage (C), cabbage intercropped with tomato (C+T), cabbage intercropped with chilli (C+ Chi)”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate application had no significant impact on diamondback moth infestation.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- Insecticide (acephate) applicatione0
- Interactor
- DBMe0pest
- Outcome
- DBM infestatione0
- Direction
- no significant impacte0
- Comparator
- no insecticidee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Insecticide (acephate) application has no significant impact on DBM infestation”
e1“insecticide (I) and no insecticide (I0)”
t0“Cabbage”
The same questions in other papers
Solanum lycopersicum · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →insecticide · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.