Paper · 2019 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Steel slag and phosphate nutrition of corn inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Anita Bueno de Camargo Nunes; Orivaldo José Saggin Júnior; Eliane Maria Ribeiro da Silva; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of the use of steel slag as a soil acidity corrective and of mycorrhizal fungi associated with phosphate fertilization on corn plants. The study was performed in a greenhouse, using 3-kg pots with a Typic Haplorthox, in a 4x5x2 factorial arrangement, with four acidity correction treatments (C1, correction with dolomitic limestone at a dose of 4 Mg ha-1; C2, correction with steel slag at a dose of 4 Mg ha-1; C3, correction with a 1:1 mixture of 2 Mg ha-1 dolomitic limestone and 2 Mg ha-1 steel slag; and C4, control, without pH correction), five phosphorus doses (0, 42, 95, 213, and 480 mg dm-3), and the presence or absence of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus clarus and Gigaspora margarita), with five replicates. Steel slag was efficient in correcting soil pH and providing Ca and Mg for the plants; therefore, it could replace limestone. The inoculation with R. clarus and G. margarita, associated with P doses of 42, 95, and 213 mg dm-3, improved the development of corn plants after 45 days, resulting in greater plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, and shoot and root dry matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steel slag was efficient in correcting soil pH and providing calcium and magnesium for corn, relative to limestone.

Treatment
Steel slage1
Outcome
correcting soil pH and providing Ca and Mg for the plantse1
Direction
efficiente1
Comparator
limestonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Steel slag and phosphate nutrition of corn inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Steel slag was efficient in correcting soil pH and providing Ca and Mg for the plants; therefore, it could replace limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Rhizophagus clarus and Gigaspora margarita at 42, 95 and 213 mg dm-3 P increased corn plant height, stem diameter and leaf area after 45 days in the greenhouse.

Treatment
inoculation with R. clarus and G. margarita, associated with P doses of 42, 95, and 213 mg dm-3e2
Interactor
R. clarusRhizophagus claruse2symbiont
Second interactor
G. margaritaGigaspora margaritae2symbiont
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, leaf areae2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
after 45 dayse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gigaspora margarita
Gigaspora margarita · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Steel slag and phosphate nutrition of corn inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inoculation with R. clarus and G. margarita, associated with P doses of 42, 95, and 213 mg dm-3, improved the development of corn plants after 45 days, resulting in greater plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, and shoot and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1170 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study was performed in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Rhizophagus clarus and Gigaspora margarita at 42, 95 and 213 mg dm-3 P increased corn shoot and root dry matter after 45 days in the greenhouse.

Treatment
inoculation with R. clarus and G. margarita, associated with P doses of 42, 95, and 213 mg dm-3e2
Interactor
R. clarusRhizophagus claruse2symbiont
Second interactor
G. margaritaGigaspora margaritae2symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry mattere2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
after 45 dayse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gigaspora margarita
Gigaspora margarita · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Steel slag and phosphate nutrition of corn inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inoculation with R. clarus and G. margarita, associated with P doses of 42, 95, and 213 mg dm-3, improved the development of corn plants after 45 days, resulting in greater plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, and shoot and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1170 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study was performed in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–238 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus clarus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Gigaspora margarita · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.