Paper · 2009 · Botany

Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophyticAzospirillumin the alleviation of drought effects in maize

Ana C. Cohen; Claudia N. Travaglia; Rubén Bottini; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
371
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Azospirillum spp. are plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) that enhance growth by several mechanisms, including the production of phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and gibberellins (GAs). Their presence may also alleviate plant water stress. In the present paper, the effects of Azospirillum lipoferum in maize ( Zea mays L.) plants treated with inhibitors of ABA and GA synthesis, fluridone (F) and prohexadione-Ca (P), respectively, and either submitted to drought stress or provided sufficient water, were analysed. Fluridone diminished the growth of plants that had been well watered, in a manner similar to drought, but inoculation with Azospirillum completely reversed this effect. The relative water content of the F-treated and drought-stressed plants was significantly lower (even though drought-stressed plants had been allowed to recover for one week), and this effect was completely neutralized by Azospirillum. These results were correlated with ABA levels assessed by GC-EIMS. Growth was diminished in drought-submitted plants treated with P, alone or combined with F, even though ABA levels were enhanced, suggesting that GAs produced by the bacterium are also important in stress alleviation. The results suggest that both ABA and GAs contribute to water-stress alleviation of plants by Azospirillum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone reduced growth of well-watered maize similarly to drought.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Fluridonee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
diminishede0
Comparator
well waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone diminished the growth of plants that had been well watered, in a manner similar to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation completely reversed the fluridone-associated growth reduction.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation with Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reversede0
Comparator
Fluridonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone diminished the growth of plants that had been well watered, in a manner similar to drought, but inoculation with Azospirillum completely reversed this effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone-treated maize had significantly lower relative water content.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
F-treatede0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative water content of the F-treated and drought-stressed plants was significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed maize had significantly lower relative water content, even after one week of recovery.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
drought-stressede0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
recover for one weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative water content of the F-treated and drought-stressed plants was significantly lower (even though drought-stressed plants had been allowed to recover for one week)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum completely neutralized the reduction in relative water content.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
neutralizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative water content of the F-treated and drought-stressed plants was significantly lower (even though drought-stressed plants had been allowed to recover for one week), and this effect was completely neutralized by Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth was diminished under drought with prohexadione-Ca treatment alone.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
drought-submittede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was diminished in drought-submitted plants treated with P, alone or combined with F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth was diminished under drought when prohexadione-Ca and fluridone were combined.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
P, alone or combined with Fe0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
drought-submittede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was diminished in drought-submitted plants treated with P, alone or combined with F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA levels were enhanced in drought-submitted plants treated with prohexadione-Ca.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
ABA levelse0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was diminished in drought-submitted plants treated with P, alone or combined with F, even though ABA levels were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ABA and gibberellins both contribute to Azospirillum-mediated water-stress alleviation.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Compound
ABA and GAse0
Outcome
water-stress alleviatione0
Qualifier
suggeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that both ABA and GAs contribute to water-stress alleviation of plants by Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–371 · show in text ↑

Fluridone · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Azospirillum · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 252 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.