Paper · 2019 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Cultivar and insecticide spraying time effects on cowpea insect pests and grain yield in northern Ghana

F. Kusi; J.A. Nboyine; M. Abudulai; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Insecticide application is the recommended practice for control of insect pests on cowpea (Vigna unquiculata (L) Walp). However, these have negative effects on humans and the environment, apart from being costly for resource-poor farmers. This study aimed at identifying appropriate combinations of cultivar and insecticide spraying times for the management of economically important insect pests of cowpea in northern Ghana. The study was conducted in two successive rainy seasons at two locations situated in the Sudan and Guinea Savannah zones of northern Ghana. The experimental layout was a complete randomized split plot design with main-plots consisting of different numbers and timing of insecticide application and sub-plots consisting of 6 different cowpea cultivars. Data collected included insect pest abundances, components of yield and yield. Thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom), legume pod borer (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) and a complex of pod-sucking bugs (PSBs) were the dominant insect pests. Their abundance and damage were not significantly different between the untreated control and cowpea sprayed once at 50% flowering stage. In contrast, protecting cowpea with either two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding) or three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding) significantly lowered insect pest abundance and increased grain yield. Apart from the farmer's cultivar which was susceptible to pest attacks, the improved ones showed variable levels of tolerance to the different pest categories. Combining at least two rounds of insecticide sprays with any improved variety suppressed pest populations and increase cowpea grain yield. Keywords: Cowpea, Insecticide treatments, Savannahs, Yield, Damage levels, Integrated pest management

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips, legume pod borers and pod sucking bugs were the dominant cowpea pests.

Interactor
ThripsThripse0pest
Second interactor
legume pod borere0pest
Outcome
dominant insect pestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom), legume pod borer (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) and a complex of pod-sucking bugs (PSBs) were the dominant insect pests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A single insecticide spray at 50% flowering did not significantly differ from untreated cowpea for pest abundance and damage.

Treatment
sprayed once at 50% flowering stagee0
Outcome
abundance and damagee0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their abundance and damage were not significantly different between the untreated control and cowpea sprayed once at 50% flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two rounds of insecticide spraying significantly reduced pest abundance in cowpea.

Treatment
two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding)e0
Outcome
insect pest abundancee0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protecting cowpea with either two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding) or three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding) significantly lowered insect pest abundance and increased grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rounds of insecticide spraying significantly reduced pest abundance in cowpea.

Treatment
three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding)e0
Outcome
insect pest abundancee0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protecting cowpea with either two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding) or three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding) significantly lowered insect pest abundance and increased grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two rounds of insecticide spraying significantly increased cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protecting cowpea with either two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding) or three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding) significantly lowered insect pest abundance and increased grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rounds of insecticide spraying significantly increased cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protecting cowpea with either two (i.e., flower bud initiation and early podding) or three rounds of insecticide sprays (i.e., bud initiation, 50% flowering and 50% podding) significantly lowered insect pest abundance and increased grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmer cultivar was susceptible to pest attack, while improved cultivars varied in tolerance.

Material
improved onese0
Outcome
variable levels of tolerancee0
Comparator
farmer's cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apart from the farmer's cultivar which was susceptible to pest attacks, the improved ones showed variable levels of tolerance to the different pest categories.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least two insecticide sprays with an improved cowpea variety suppressed pest populations and increased grain yield.

Treatment
at least two rounds of insecticide sprays with any improved varietye0
Outcome
suppressed pest populations and increase cowpea grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining at least two rounds of insecticide sprays with any improved variety suppressed pest populations and increase cowpea grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑

application · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

insecticide · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

stage · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.