Paper · 2022 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Influence of insecticide spray regime and weed management methods on growth and yield of cowpea

Joseph Aremu Adigun; Victor Idowu Olowe; Olusegun Raphael Adeyemi; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) production in Nigeria is limited mainly due to weed and insect infestations. The effects of insecticide spray regime and weed control on the productivity of cowpea were evaluated in the early and late seasons of 2020. Two insecticide sprays produced increased growth and yield in the late cropping season. However, in the early cropping season, optimum growth and yield of cowpea were obtained with four insecticide sprays. Regardless of the cropping season, preemergence (PRE) application of metolachlor or propaben plus manual weeding (MW) provided 71–80% reduction in weed density and biomass and resulted in cowpea growth and yields similar to the weed-free control. In the late season, two MWs resulted in cowpea growth and yield similar to the weed-free control. However, in the early season treatment, two MWs resulted in 51% lower yield than the weed-free control. The results showed that four insecticide sprays in the early cropping season or two insecticidal sprays in the late cropping season integrated with metolachlor or propaben application plus MW improved the productivity of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two insecticide sprays increased cowpea growth and yield in the late cropping season.

Treatment
Two insecticide sprayse1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
late cropping seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) production in Nigeria is limited mainly due to weed and insect infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two insecticide sprays produced increased growth and yield in the late cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four insecticide sprays gave optimum cowpea growth and yield in the early cropping season.

Treatment
four insecticide sprayse2
Outcome
optimum growth and yielde2
Direction
optimume2
Setting
early cropping seasone2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“However, in the early cropping season, optimum growth and yield of cowpea were obtained with four insecticide sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence application of metolachlor or propaben plus manual weeding gave a 71–80% reduction in weed density and biomass in cowpea.

Treatment
preemergence (PRE) application of metolachlor or propaben plus manual weeding (MW)e3
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse3
Direction
reductione3
Value
71–80%e3
Setting
cropping seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) production in Nigeria is limited mainly due to weed and insect infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Regardless of the cropping season, preemergence (PRE) application of metolachlor or propaben plus manual weeding (MW) provided 71–80% reduction in weed density and biomass and resulted in cowpea growth and yields similar to the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two manual weedings gave cowpea growth and yield similar to the weed-free control in the late season.

Treatment
two MWse4
Outcome
growth and yielde4
Direction
similare4
Comparator
weed-free controle4
Setting
late seasone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In the late season, two MWs resulted in cowpea growth and yield similar to the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two manual weedings resulted in 51% lower cowpea yield than the weed-free control in the early season.

Treatment
two MWse5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
lowere5
Value
51%e5
Comparator
weed-free controle5
Setting
early seasone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) production in Nigeria is limited mainly due to weed and insect infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, in the early season treatment, two MWs resulted in 51% lower yield than the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–907 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · weed · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.