Paper · 2001 · African Crop Science Journal

Integrated management of cowpea insect pests using elite cultivars, date of planting and minimum insecticide application

S. K. Asante; M. Tamo; L. E.N. Jackai; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Trials were conducted in Kano, northern Nigeria, during 1996 and 1997 cropping seasons to determine the influence of date of planting and two well-timed insecticides sprays on the incidence of major insect pests namely, the legume pod-borer, Maruca vitrata Fab., legume flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, complex of pod-sucking bugs and cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch and their effect on grain yield of elite cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) cultivars from International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) breeding programme. Six cultivars were planted at 4 different dates between 13 June and 12 August 1996 whilst 12 cultivars were planted at 5 different dates between 5 June and 12 August 1997 with and without insecticide protection. Aphid infestation occurred only on cowpea planted between the first week of June and mid-July with the highest incidence recorded on crop planted in the last week of June. Cowpea planted in June flowered and podded between early to mid-August when post-flowering pests (M. vitrata, M. sjostedti and Clarigralla tomentosicollis) densities were relatively low and produced significantly higher grain yields without insecticide protection compared to other planting dates. The flowering and pod formation stages of late planted (July and August) crops coincided with the peak population densities of the three major post-flowering pests resulting in a considerable reduction of grain yield. Overall, IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 and IT93K-513-2 performed best whereas IT86D-719, IAR-48 and Dan Ila gave the poorest performance when unsprayed. Two insecticide sprays of Cypermethrin + dimethoate (Sherpa plus ®) (30 + 250g a.i. ha-1) at but initiation and 50% flowering stages increased grain yields considerably from 225 to 900 kg ha-1 for cowpea planted in July and August. Cost-benefit analysis indicated that the insecticide application was more profitable for cowpea planted in late July and August than was the case when planted in June and early July. This seems to suggest that early maturing elite cultivars could escape economic damage caused by post-flowering pests when cowpea is planted early in the season. The implication of these findings to the grower and the breeding strategy at IITA is discussed in this paper. RÉSUMÉ Des essais ont été conduits durant les saisons culturales de 1996 et 1997 à Kano au nord du Nigeria pour déterminer l'influence de la date de plantation et la pulverization de deux insecticides bien connus sur l'incidence des principaux insectes à savoir les boreurs des gousses des légumineuses, Muruca vitrata Fab., les thrips des fleurs des légumineuses, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, le complexe des punaises pipeuses des gousses et les aphides du niébe, Aphis craccivora Koch et les effets sur le rendement grain des cultivars élites du niébe du programme d'amélioration de l'IITA. Six cultivars ont été plantés à quatre differentes dates entre le 13 Juin et le 12 Août 1996 alors que 12 cultivars ont été plantés à cinq differentes dates entre le 5 Juin et le 12 Août 1997 avec ou sans protection d'insecticide. L'infestation des aphides ont apparu seulement sur le niébe plantés entre la première semaine de juin et mi-juillet avec l'incidence la plus élevée observée sur les cultures plantées dans la dernière semaine de Juin. Le niébe planté en Juin a fleuri et formé des gousses entre très tôt et mi-Août quant les densités des pestes post floraison (M. vitrata, M. sjostedt et C. tomentosicollis) étaient relativement faibles et ont produit significativement des rendements grains très élevés sans insecticides comparés aux autres dates de plantation. Les stades de floraison et de formation des gousses des cultures plantées plus tard (Juillet et Août) ont coincidé avec les densités plus élevées de trois majeurs pestes pot-floraison résultant à une réduction considérable du rendement grain. En général, IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 et IT93K-518-2 ont été les meilleurs alors que IT86D-719, IAT-48 et Dan Iia ont eu une pauvre performance lorsqu'ils étaient no pulverisés. Les pulverizations de l'insecticide de Cypermethrin + dimethoate (Sheroa plus R ) (30 + 250g a.i ha-1) à l'initiation et 50% des stades de floraison ont augmenté les rendements grains considérablement de 225 à 900 kg ha-1 pour le niébe planté en Juillet et Août. L'analyse du coût-bénéfice a indiqué que l'application de l'insecticide était plus profitable pour le niébe planté tard en Juillet et Août plus que le cas du niébe planté en Juin et début Juillet. Ceci semble indique que les cultivars élites plus précoces pourraient échapper aux domages économiques causés par les pestes post floraison quant ils apparaissent avant dans la saison. Les implications de ces résultats pour les cultivateurs et la stratégie d'amélioration pour l'IITA sont dicutées. (Af Crop Science and Production: 2001 9(4): 655-666)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid infestation occurred only on cowpea planted between the first week of June and mid-July.

Treatment
planted between the first week of June and mid-Julye1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
Aphid infestatione1
Direction
occurred onlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphid infestation occurred only on cowpea planted between the first week of June and mid-July with the highest incidence recorded on crop planted in the last week of June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–934 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid incidence on cowpea was highest on crop planted in the last week of June.

Treatment
crop planted in the last week of Junee1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
incidencee1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphid infestation occurred only on cowpea planted between the first week of June and mid-July with the highest incidence recorded on crop planted in the last week of June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea planted in June produced significantly higher grain yields without insecticide protection than other planting dates.

Treatment
planted in Junee2
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
without insecticide protectione2
Comparator
other planting datese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cowpea planted in June flowered and podded between early to mid-August when post-flowering pests (M. vitrata, M. sjostedti and Clarigralla tomentosicollis) densities were relatively low and produced significantly higher grain yields without insecticide protection compared to other planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-flowering pest densities were relatively low on cowpea planted in June.

Treatment
planted in Junee2
Interactor
post-flowering pestse2pest
Outcome
densitiese2
Direction
relatively lowe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cowpea planted in June flowered and podded between early to mid-August when post-flowering pests (M. vitrata, M. sjostedti and Clarigralla tomentosicollis) densities were relatively low and produced significantly higher grain yields without insecticide protection compared to other planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planted cowpea crops had a considerable reduction of grain yield where flowering coincided with peak post-flowering pest densities.

Treatment
late planted (July and August) cropse4
Interactor
post-flowering pestse4pest
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
reductione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“The flowering and pod formation stages of late planted (July and August) crops coincided with the peak population densities of the three major post-flowering pests resulting in a considerable reduction of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 and IT93K-513-2 performed best in unsprayed cowpea.

Material
IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 and IT93K-513-2e5
Outcome
performed beste5
Qualifier
when unsprayede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e5

“IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 and IT93K-513-2 performed best whereas IT86D-719, IAR-48 and Dan Ila gave the poorest performance when unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT86D-719, IAR-48 and Dan Ila gave the poorest performance in unsprayed cowpea.

Material
IT86D-719, IAR-48 and Dan Ilae5
Outcome
poorest performancee5
Qualifier
when unsprayede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e5

“IT90K-277-2, IT93K-734, IT93K-452-1 and IT93K-513-2 performed best whereas IT86D-719, IAR-48 and Dan Ila gave the poorest performance when unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two insecticide sprays of Cypermethrin + dimethoate increased cowpea grain yields considerably from 225 to 900 kg ha-1 for cowpea planted in July and August.

Treatment
Two insecticide sprays of Cypermethrin + dimethoatee6
Outcome
grain yieldse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
from 225 to 900 kg ha-1e7
Qualifier
for cowpea planted in July and Auguste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“Two insecticide sprays of Cypermethrin + dimethoate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1662 · show in text ↑
e7

“increased grain yields considerably from 225 to 900 kg ha-1 for cowpea planted in July and August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide application was more profitable for cowpea planted in late July and August than when planted in June and early July.

Treatment
insecticide applicatione7
Outcome
profitablee7
Direction
moree7
Qualifier
Cost-benefit analysise7
Comparator
when planted in June and early Julye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“Cost-benefit analysis indicated that the insecticide application was more profitable for cowpea planted in late July and August than was the case when planted in June and early July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–2024 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early maturing elite cultivars could escape economic damage from post-flowering pests when cowpea is planted early in the season.

Treatment
when cowpea is planted early in the seasone7
Interactor
post-flowering pestse7pest
Outcome
escape economic damagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“This seems to suggest that early maturing elite cultivars could escape economic damage caused by post-flowering pests when cowpea is planted early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2026–2186 · show in text ↑

dimethoate · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cypermethrin · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.