Paper · 2010

Effect of Organically Chelated Micronutrients on Growth and Productivity in Okra

R.B. Datir; S. L. Laware; B. J. Apparao

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soybean and mungbean seeds were germinated and extracted after 48 hours in glass distilled water. The homogenate was subjected to protein digestion with Aspergillus protease for 12 hours. After enzymatic digestion the content was filtered and centrifuged in refrigerated centrifuge. The supernatant was used as source of amino acids for chelating the micronutrients. The micronutrient were mixed with amino acid solution and kept on shaker for 4 hours. The amino acid micronutrient chelates were confirmed with FTIR. The seeds of okra var. Phule Utkarsha were obtained from MPKV Rahuri dist. Ahmednagar and used for filed experiments. The experimental plants were sprayed with 0.4 to 2.0 % solutions of organically chelated micronutrients on 15 day and 30 day after plantation. The control plants were sprayed with distilled water. The results of present investigation revealed that all the treatments showed significant increase in growth and productivity of okra. The plants treated with 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 % sprays of chelated micronutrient solution showed higher yields as compared to control Amino acids, chelated micronutrients, productivity, okra th th

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All chelated micronutrient treatments significantly increased okra growth.

Treatment
0.4 to 2.0 % solutions of organically chelated micronutrientse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experimental plants were sprayed with 0.4 to 2.0 % solutions of organically chelated micronutrients on 15 day and 30 day after plantation. The control plants were sprayed with distilled water. The results of present investigation revealed that all the treatments showed significant increase in growth and productivity of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All chelated micronutrient treatments significantly increased okra productivity.

Treatment
0.4 to 2.0 % solutions of organically chelated micronutrientse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experimental plants were sprayed with 0.4 to 2.0 % solutions of organically chelated micronutrients on 15 day and 30 day after plantation. The control plants were sprayed with distilled water. The results of present investigation revealed that all the treatments showed significant increase in growth and productivity of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.2 % spray produced higher okra yield than control.

Treatment
1.2e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plants treated with 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 % sprays of chelated micronutrient solution showed higher yields as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.6 % spray produced higher okra yield than control.

Treatment
1.6e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plants treated with 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 % sprays of chelated micronutrient solution showed higher yields as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2.0 % spray produced higher okra yield than control.

Treatment
2.0 % sprays of chelated micronutrient solutione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plants treated with 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 % sprays of chelated micronutrient solution showed higher yields as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1094 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.