Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Integrated Nutrient Management in Rice–Wheat Cropping System: An Evidence on Sustainability in the Indian Subcontinent through Meta-Analysis

Sheetal Sharma; Rajeev Padbhushan; Upendra Kumar

17
claims
30
verbatim quotes
85
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Over years of intensive cultivation and imbalanced fertilizer use, the soils of the Indian subcontinent have become deficient in several nutrients and are impoverished in organic matter. Recently, this region has started emphasizing a shift from inorganic to organic farming to manage soil health. However, owing to the steadily increasing demands for food by the overgrowing populations of this region, a complete shift to an organic farming system is not possible. The rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS) is in crisis because of falling or static yields. The nations of this region have already recognized this problem and have modified farming systems toward integrated nutrient management (INM) practices. The INM concept aims to design farming systems to ensure sustainability by improving soil health, while securing food for the population by improving crop productivity. Therefore, this paper was synthesized to quantify the impact and role of INM in improving crop productivity and sustainability of the RWCS in the context of the Indian subcontinent through meta-analysis using 338 paired data during the period of 1989–2016. The meta-analysis of the whole data for rice and wheat showed a positive increase in the grain yield of both crops with the use of INM over inorganic fertilizers only (IORA), organic fertilizers only (ORA), and control (no fertilizers; CO) treatments. The increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 for rice in INM over ORA and CO treatments. For wheat, the increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 in INM over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments. The yield differences in the INM treatment over IORA were 0.05 and 0.13 Mg ha−1, respectively, in rice and wheat crops. The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments were 2.52, 29.2, and 90.9, respectively, in loamy soil and 0.60, 24.9, and 93.7, respectively, in clayey soil. The net returns increased by 121% (INM vs. CO) in rice, and 9.34% (INM vs. IORA) and 127% (INM vs. CO) in wheat crop. Use of integrated nutrient management had a positive effect on soil properties as compared to other nutrient management options. Overall, the yield gain and maintenance of soil health due to INM practices over other nutrient management practices in RWCS can be a viable nutrient management option in the Indian subcontinent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased rice grain yield over organic fertilizer alone.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
ORAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 for rice in INM over ORA and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased rice grain yield over no fertilizer control.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
COe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 for rice in INM over ORA and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased rice grain yield over inorganic fertilizer alone by 0.05 Mg ha−1.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.05e0
Comparator
IORAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield differences in the INM treatment over IORA were 0.05 and 0.13 Mg ha−1, respectively, in rice and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly increased wheat grain yield over inorganic fertilizer alone.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
IORAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, the increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 in INM over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly increased wheat grain yield over organic fertilizer alone.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
ORAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, the increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 in INM over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly increased wheat grain yield over no fertilizer control.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
COe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, the increase in grain yield was significant at p < 0.05 in INM over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over inorganic fertilizer alone by 2.52% in loamy soil.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
2.52e1
Comparator
IORAe1
Setting
loamy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments were 2.52, 29.2, and 90.9, respectively, in loamy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over organic fertilizer alone by 29.2% in loamy soil.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
29.2e1
Comparator
ORAe1
Setting
loamy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments were 2.52, 29.2, and 90.9, respectively, in loamy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over no fertilizer control by 90.9% in loamy soil.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
90.9e1
Comparator
COe1
Setting
loamy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments were 2.52, 29.2, and 90.9, respectively, in loamy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over inorganic fertilizer alone by 0.60% in clayey soil.

Treatment
INMe2
Outcome
yield increasese2
Direction
increasese2
Value
0.60e1
Comparator
IORAe2
Setting
clayey soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.60, 24.9, and 93.7, respectively, in clayey soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1903 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over organic fertilizer alone by 24.9% in clayey soil.

Treatment
INMe2
Outcome
yield increasese2
Direction
increasese2
Value
24.9e1
Comparator
ORAe2
Setting
clayey soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.60, 24.9, and 93.7, respectively, in clayey soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1903 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised grain yield over no fertilizer control by 93.7% in clayey soil.

Treatment
INMe2
Outcome
yield increasese2
Direction
increasese2
Value
93.7e1
Comparator
COe2
Setting
clayey soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole data for rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.60, 24.9, and 93.7, respectively, in clayey soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1903 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percent yield increases in INM treatment over IORA, ORA, and CO treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised rice net returns by 121% over control.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
121%e0
Comparator
COe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net returns increased by 121% (INM vs. CO) in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–1959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised wheat net returns by 9.34% over inorganic fertilizer alone.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.34%e0
Comparator
IORAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net returns increased by 121% (INM vs. CO) in rice, and 9.34% (INM vs. IORA) and 127% (INM vs. CO) in wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management raised wheat net returns by 127% over control.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
127%e0
Comparator
COe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net returns increased by 121% (INM vs. CO) in rice, and 9.34% (INM vs. IORA) and 127% (INM vs. CO) in wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management improved soil properties relative to other nutrient management options in the rice–wheat system.

Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Comparator
other nutrient management optionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice–Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Use of integrated nutrient management had a positive effect on soil properties as compared to other nutrient management options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2023–2150 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider integrated nutrient management a viable option for rice–wheat cropping in the Indian subcontinent.

Outcome
viable nutrient management optione0
Setting
Indian subcontinente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice–Wheat Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“INM practices over other nutrient management practices in RWCS can be a viable nutrient management option in the Indian subcontinent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2346 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.