Paper · 2002 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen on productivity and soil fertility under rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop sequence

R. K. Paikaray; B. S. Mahapatra; Geeta Sharma

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during 1996-97 to 1997-98 to evaluate the effectiveness of prickly sesban [Sesbania cannabina (Retz.) Pers.] (green-manure), wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)-straw incorporation and inclusion of summer cowpea [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] fodder in rotation along with nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat system. Grain yield of rice with Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ ha (5.73 tonnes/ha), inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/ha (5.70 tonnes/ha) and wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/ha to rice crop (5.79 tonnes/ha) were statistically similar with no organic N with 120 kg N/ha (5.71 tonnes/ha), indicating saving of 80 kg N/ha for green-manuring and 40 kg N/ha each for cowpea fodder and wheat straw incorporation. Sesbania green-manuring to rice increased the wheat grain yield by about 0.4 tonne/ha. The highest grain yield of wheat (4.48 tonnes/ha) was recorded from Sesbania green-manuring to rice with 120 kg N/ ha to both of rice and wheat crop in the cropping system. Soil fertility in terms of organic carbon (0.03-0.06%), available N (5.8-22.0 kg/ha), P (1.4-3.8 kg/ha) and K (2.2-17.9 kg/ha) increased under green-manure. wheat-straw incorporation, summer cowpea fodder and at higher levels of inorganic N. Only available K had negative balance in soils of cowpea fodder and the control plots and at lower levels of nitrogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with Sesbania green manure plus 40 kg N/ha was statistically similar to rice with 120 kg N/ha and no organic N.

Treatment
Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ hae1
Outcome
Grain yield of ricee1
Direction
statistically similare1
Value
5.73 tonnes/hae1
Comparator
no organic N with 120 kg N/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of rice with Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ ha (5.73 tonnes/ha), inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/ha (5.70 tonnes/ha) and wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/ha to rice crop (5.79 tonnes/ha) were statistically similar with no organic N with 120 kg N/ha (5.71 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with cowpea fodder plus 80 kg N/ha was statistically similar to rice with 120 kg N/ha and no organic N.

Treatment
inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/hae1
Outcome
Grain yield of ricee1
Direction
statistically similare1
Value
5.70 tonnes/hae1
Comparator
no organic N with 120 kg N/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of rice with Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ ha (5.73 tonnes/ha), inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/ha (5.70 tonnes/ha) and wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/ha to rice crop (5.79 tonnes/ha) were statistically similar with no organic N with 120 kg N/ha (5.71 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with wheat straw incorporation plus 80 kg N/ha was statistically similar to rice with 120 kg N/ha and no organic N.

Treatment
wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/hae1
Outcome
Grain yield of ricee1
Direction
statistically similare1
Value
5.79 tonnes/hae1
Comparator
no organic N with 120 kg N/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of rice with Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ ha (5.73 tonnes/ha), inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/ha (5.70 tonnes/ha) and wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/ha to rice crop (5.79 tonnes/ha) were statistically similar with no organic N with 120 kg N/ha (5.71 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–668 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic N sources saved about 80 kg N/ha for green manuring and 40 kg N/ha each for cowpea fodder and wheat straw.

Outcome
saving of 80 kg N/ha for green-manuringe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Grain yield of rice with Sesbania green-manure with 40 kg N/ ha (5.73 tonnes/ha), inclusion of cowpea fodder with 80 kg N/ha (5.70 tonnes/ha) and wheat straw incorporation with 80 kg N/ha to rice crop (5.79 tonnes/ha) were statistically similar with no organic N with 120 kg N/ha (5.71 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“indicating saving of 80 kg N/ha for green-manuring and 40 kg N/ha each for cowpea fodder and wheat straw incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manuring to rice increased wheat grain yield by about 0.4 t/ha.

Treatment
Sesbania green-manuring to ricee3
Outcome
wheat grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
about 0.4 tonne/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Sesbania green-manuring to rice increased the wheat grain yield by about 0.4 tonne/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wheat grain yield, 4.48 t/ha, came from Sesbania green manuring with 120 kg N/ha for both rice and wheat.

Treatment
Sesbania green-manuring to rice with 120 kg N/ ha to both of rice and wheat crope4
Outcome
grain yield of wheate4
Direction
higheste4
Value
4.48 tonnes/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest grain yield of wheat (4.48 tonnes/ha) was recorded from Sesbania green-manuring to rice with 120 kg N/ ha to both of rice and wheat crop in the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased soil organic carbon to 0.03-0.06%.

Treatment
green-manuree5
Outcome
organic carbone5
Direction
increasede5
Value
0.03-0.06%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil fertility in terms of organic carbon (0.03-0.06%), available N (5.8-22.0 kg/ha), P (1.4-3.8 kg/ha) and K (2.2-17.9 kg/ha) increased under green-manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased available soil N to 5.8-22.0 kg/ha.

Treatment
green-manuree5
Outcome
available Ne5
Direction
increasede5
Value
5.8-22.0 kg/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil fertility in terms of organic carbon (0.03-0.06%), available N (5.8-22.0 kg/ha), P (1.4-3.8 kg/ha) and K (2.2-17.9 kg/ha) increased under green-manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased soil P to 1.4-3.8 kg/ha.

Treatment
green-manuree5
Outcome
Pe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
1.4-3.8 kg/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil fertility in terms of organic carbon (0.03-0.06%), available N (5.8-22.0 kg/ha), P (1.4-3.8 kg/ha) and K (2.2-17.9 kg/ha) increased under green-manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased soil K to 2.2-17.9 kg/ha.

Treatment
green-manuree5
Outcome
Ke5
Direction
increasede5
Value
2.2-17.9 kg/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil fertility in terms of organic carbon (0.03-0.06%), available N (5.8-22.0 kg/ha), P (1.4-3.8 kg/ha) and K (2.2-17.9 kg/ha) increased under green-manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea fodder gave a negative available K balance in soil, compared with control plots and lower N levels.

Treatment
cowpea foddere6
Outcome
available Ke6
Direction
negative balancee6
Qualifier
at lower levels of nitrogene6
Comparator
control plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
e6

“Only available K had negative balance in soils of cowpea fodder and the control plots and at lower levels of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1409 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 50 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Green manure and grain cropping with residue incorporation made similar positive contributions to rice yield.

    Lowland Rice Response to Urea Following Three Cowpea Cropping Systems · 1989 · compared with for grain, with incorporation of residues remaining after harvest

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Sesbania · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 52 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Sesbania · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 279 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.