Paper · 2018 · Farming and Management

Appraisal of optimal sowing time based on heat indices and row spacing for summer guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]

14
claims
43
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer seasons of 2013 to 2015 on clayey soil of Junagadh (Gujarat) to ascertain proper time of sowing (4th week of January, 2nd week of February and 4th week of February) and spacing (30 x 15 cm, 45 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm) in relation to growth and yield of guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]. The results revealed that sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight and ultimately gave higher seed yield (1387 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2846 kg/ha) with higher growing degree days (GDD), helio thermal units (HTU), photo thermal units (PTU) and heat use efficiency (HUE) as well as higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing. The results further indicated that 45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm, which reflected in higher seed yield (1272 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2680 kg/ha) along with higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03) over 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing. Therefore, sowing in 2nd week of February (when soil temperature >22.3oC at 5 cm and >23.9oC at 10 cm depth) and spacing of 45 x 15 cm could be appropriate for maximizing yield and monetary returns from summer guar under south Saurashtra agro-climatic conditions of Gujarat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February enhanced plant height, pods per plant and test weight of summer guar relative to early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
plant height, pods per plant and test weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave a higher seed yield of summer guar (1387 kg/ha) than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
1387 kg/hae1
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“ultimately gave higher seed yield (1387 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2846 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–566 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave a higher stalk yield of summer guar (2846 kg/ha) than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
stalk yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2846 kg/hae1
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“ultimately gave higher seed yield (1387 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2846 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–566 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave higher growing degree days, helio thermal units and photo thermal units than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
growing degree days (GDD), helio thermal units (HTU), photo thermal units (PTU)e2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e2

“with higher growing degree days (GDD), helio thermal units (HTU), photo thermal units (PTU) and heat use efficiency (HUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–688 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave a higher heat use efficiency for summer guar than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
heat use efficiency (HUE)e2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e2

“with higher growing degree days (GDD), helio thermal units (HTU), photo thermal units (PTU) and heat use efficiency (HUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–688 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
net returnse3
Direction
highere3
Value
Rs. 42, 051/hae3
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February gave a higher B:C ratio (2.29) for summer guar than early and late sowing

Treatment
sowing in 2nd week of Februarye0
Outcome
B: C ratioe3
Direction
highere3
Value
2.29e3
Comparator
early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 2nd week of February enhanced growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, pods per plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–486 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher net returns (Rs. 42, 051/ha) and B: C ratio (2.29) over early (4th week of January) and late (4th week of February) sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm promoted plant height, branches per plant and pods per plant of summer guar relative to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
plant height, branches per plant, pods per plante4
Direction
promotede4
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm promoted test weight of summer guar relative to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
test weighte4
Direction
promotede4
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm gave a higher seed yield of summer guar (1272 kg/ha) than 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
1272 kg/hae5
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“which reflected in higher seed yield (1272 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2680 kg/ha) along with higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm gave a higher stalk yield of summer guar (2680 kg/ha) than 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
stalk yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
2680 kg/hae5
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“which reflected in higher seed yield (1272 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2680 kg/ha) along with higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm gave higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) for summer guar than 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
net returnse5
Direction
highere5
Value
Rs. 37, 154/hae5
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“which reflected in higher seed yield (1272 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2680 kg/ha) along with higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 45 x 15 cm gave a higher B:C ratio (2.03) for summer guar than 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm spacing

Treatment
45 x 15 cm spacinge4
Outcome
B: C ratioe5
Direction
highere5
Value
2.03e5
Comparator
30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“45 x 15 cm spacing promoted growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant and test weight compared to 30 x 15 cm and 60 x 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“which reflected in higher seed yield (1272 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2680 kg/ha) along with higher net returns (Rs. 37, 154/ha) and B: C ratio (2.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1179 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the 2nd week of February and a spacing of 45 x 15 cm could be appropriate for maximizing yield and monetary returns of summer guar under the stated conditions

Outcome
maximizing yield and monetary returnse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“sowing in 2nd week of February (when soil temperature >22.3oC at 5 cm and >23.9oC at 10 cm depth) and spacing of 45 x 15 cm could be appropriate for maximizing yield and monetary returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1417 · show in text ↑

density · quality: grain · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

density · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.