Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

The Appropriate Sowing Time and Plant Density to Achieve Higher Yield of Cluster Beans

Muhammad Zubair; Rashid Minhas; Muhammad I. Akram; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment conducted on the guar crop had three main objectives. Choosing the ideal time to sow, determining the appropriate plant density, and examining the effects of various planting dates and plant densities on the yield and yield-related factors of various guar varieties. The field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station in Bahawalpur in 2019 and 2020. Two guar genotypes (BR-2017 and S-6384) were used in a split-split plot design with three replications to evaluate the three plant densities (D1: 15, D2: 25, and D3: 40 plants/m2) and six planting dates (from 1st May to 15th July).The results showed that the early sowing dates (1st May to 1st June) improved the plant height, pod length, clusters per plant, number of pods per cluster, grain per pod, and seed yield. The late planting dates (15th June to 15th July) produced the lowest values of these attributes. The results showed that the yield was not affected by the plant density, but other morphological traits were varied. The study found a significant difference in the yield between the two guar varieties at all the sowing times and plant densities tested. In 2019, BR-2017 had the best yield, and S-6384 had the best yield in 2020.It is concluded that farmers in Pakistan should sow their guar crop between the 1st of May to the 1st of June. It is important to note that plant density has a marginal effect on yield. In two years, both guar genotypes performed admirably.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing improved plant height, pod length and clusters per plant.

Taxon
Cluster BeansCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
early sowing dates (1st May to 1st June)e0
Outcome
plant height, pod length, clusters per plante0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the early sowing dates (1st May to 1st June) improved the plant height, pod length, clusters per plant, number of pods per cluster, grain per pod, and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing improved pods per cluster, grain per pod and seed yield.

Taxon
Cluster BeansCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
early sowing dates (1st May to 1st June)e0
Outcome
number of pods per cluster, grain per pod, and seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the early sowing dates (1st May to 1st June) improved the plant height, pod length, clusters per plant, number of pods per cluster, grain per pod, and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting gave the lowest values for the reported growth and yield traits.

Taxon
Cluster BeansCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
late planting dates (15th June to 15th July)e0
Outcome
lowest values of these attributese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late planting dates (15th June to 15th July) produced the lowest values of these attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, pod length, clusters per plant, number of pods per cluster, grain per pod, and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density did not affect guar yield.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield was not affected by the plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the guar crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density varied other morphological traits.

Treatment
plant densitye1
Outcome
other morphological traitse0
Direction
variede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other morphological traits were varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“by the plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–971 · show in text ↑
e2

“on the guar crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Guar varieties differed significantly in yield across sowing times and densities.

Material
two guar varietiese0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
at all the sowing times and plant densities testede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference in the yield between the two guar varieties at all the sowing times and plant densities tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“between the two guar varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR-2017 had the best yield in 2019.

Material
BR-2017e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
In 2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2019, BR-2017 had the best yield, and S-6384 had the best yield in 2020.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the guar crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-6384 had the best yield in 2020.

Material
S-6384e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2019, BR-2017 had the best yield, and S-6384 had the best yield in 2020.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the guar crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sowing guar in Pakistan between May 1 and June 1.

Outcome
sow their guar crop between the 1st of May to the 1st of Junee0
Setting
Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers in Pakistan should sow their guar crop between the 1st of May to the 1st of June.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1339 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

density · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.