Paper · 2019 · Environmental Microbiology

Endophytes from wild cereals protect wheat plants from drought by alteration of physiological responses of the plants to water stress

Eugenio Llorens; Or Sharon; Gemma Camañes; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
62
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Endophytes contribute to plant performance, especially under harsh conditions. We therefore hypothesized that wild plants have retained beneficial endophytes that are less abundant or not present in related crop plants. To test this hypothesis, we selected two endophytes that were found in Sharon goatgrass, an ancestor of wheat, and tested their effect on bread wheat. Both endophytes infected wheat and improved sustainability and performance under water-limited conditions. To determine how the endophytes modify plant development, we measured parameters of plant growth and physiological status and performed a comparative metabolomics analysis. Endophyte-treated wheat plants had reduced levels of stress damage markers and reduced accumulation of stress-adaptation metabolites. Metabolomics profiling revealed significant differences in the response to water stress of endophyte-treated plants compared with untreated plants. Our results demonstrate the potential of endophytes from wild plants for improvement of related crops and show that the beneficial effects of two endophytes are associated with alteration of physiological responses to water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both selected endophytes infected wheat.

Interactor
endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
infected wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both endophytes infected wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Endophytes from wild cereals protect wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both endophytes improved wheat sustainability and performance under water-limited conditions.

Treatment
Endophyte-treatede1
Interactor
endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
sustainability and performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
water-limited conditionse0
Comparator
untreated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both endophytes infected wheat and improved sustainability and performance under water-limited conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“Endophyte-treated wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte-treated wheat had reduced levels of stress damage markers.

Treatment
Endophyte-treatede0
Interactor
Endophytee0symbiont
Outcome
levels of stress damage markerse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endophyte-treated wheat plants had reduced levels of stress damage markers and reduced accumulation of stress-adaptation metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte-treated wheat had reduced accumulation of stress-adaptation metabolites.

Treatment
Endophyte-treatede0
Interactor
Endophytee0symbiont
Outcome
accumulation of stress-adaptation metabolitese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endophyte-treated wheat plants had reduced levels of stress damage markers and reduced accumulation of stress-adaptation metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolomic responses to water stress differed significantly between endophyte-treated and untreated wheat.

Treatment
endophyte-treatede0
Interactor
endophytee0symbiont
Outcome
response to water stresse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metabolomics profiling revealed significant differences in the response to water stress of endophyte-treated plants compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–681 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.