Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Insights Into the Adaptation to Greenhouse Cultivation of the Traditional Mediterranean Long Shelf-Life Tomato Carrying the alc Mutation: A Multi-Trait Comparison of Landraces, Selections, and Hybrids in Open Field and Greenhouse

Maria R. Figàs; Jaime Prohens; María D. Raigón; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Long shelf-life tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) landraces, characterized by carrying the alc allele in the NOR.NAC locus, have been traditionally cultivated in the Mediterranean region. These materials are adapted to open field conditions under low input conditions. However, cultivation under greenhouse is expanding fueled by increasing demand of these traditional tomatoes. We hypothesize that the large diversity in the long shelf-life landraces and derived materials can be exploited for adaptation to these new cultivation conditions. We have evaluated 12 varieties (seven landraces, three selections and two hybrids) carrying the alc mutation under open field (OF) and greenhouse (GH) cultivation, and evaluated them for 52 morphological, agronomic, chemical properties, and chemical composition descriptors. All descriptors, except six morphological ones, were variable. The variety effect was the greatest contributor to variation for most morphological traits, as well as for fruit weight, fruit shape, dry matter, and soluble solids content. However, significant environmental and genotype × environment interaction were found for 36 and 42 descriptors, respectively. Fruits from GH plants had lower weight and firmness and were less red than those from OF. On average, in GH yield was 35% lower and daily fruit weight loss in postharvest 41% higher than in OF. However, fruits from GH had on average higher dry matter and soluble solids contents, antioxidant activity, glucose, fructose, and ascorbic acid concentrations, but lower contents in lycopene and -carotene than those from OF. A principal components analysis clearly separated varieties according to the cultivation environment. However, the distribution pattern of varieties within each of the two clusters (GH and OF) was similar, despite the strong G×E interaction for many descriptors. Landraces from the same origin plotted in the same area of each cluster, and selections and hybrids plotted together with the landraces. The results reveal a high impact of the cultivation environment on morphological, agronomic, chemical properties and chemical composition of Mediterranean long shelf-life traditional tomato varieties. This suggests that breeding programs specifically focused to adaptation to greenhouse conditions should be developed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most descriptors varied among tomato varieties.

Outcome
descriptorse0
Qualifier
except six morphological onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All descriptors, except six morphological ones, were variable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety contributed most to variation in morphology, fruit weight and composition.

Material
varietye0
Outcome
variatione0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
most morphological traits, as well as for fruit weight, fruit shape, dry matter, and soluble solids contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety effect was the greatest contributor to variation for most morphological traits, as well as for fruit weight, fruit shape, dry matter, and soluble solids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment significantly affected 36 descriptors.

Outcome
environmentale0
Value
36e0
Qualifier
descriptorse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant environmental and genotype × environment interaction were found for 36 and 42 descriptors, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“breeding programs specifically focused to adaptation to greenhouse conditions should be developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2315 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interaction significantly affected 42 descriptors.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
genotype × environment interactione0
Value
42e0
Qualifier
descriptorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant environmental and genotype × environment interaction were found for 36 and 42 descriptors, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse fruit had lower weight, firmness and redness.

Treatment
GHe0
Outcome
weight and firmness and were less rede0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits from GH plants had lower weight and firmness and were less red than those from OF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse yield was 35% lower than open field yield.

Treatment
GHe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in GH yield was 35% lower and daily fruit weight loss in postharvest 41% higher than in OF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse fruit had 41% higher daily postharvest weight loss.

Treatment
GHe0
Outcome
daily fruit weight loss in postharveste0
Direction
highere0
Value
41%e0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in GH yield was 35% lower and daily fruit weight loss in postharvest 41% higher than in OF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse fruit had higher dry matter and soluble solids.

Treatment
GHe0
Outcome
dry matter and soluble solids contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits from GH had on average higher dry matter and soluble solids contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse fruit had higher antioxidant activity and glucose and fructose concentrations.

Treatment
GHe0
Outcome
antioxidant activity, glucose, fructose, and ascorbic acid concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits from GH had on average higher dry matter and soluble solids contents, antioxidant activity, glucose, fructose, and ascorbic acid concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse fruit had lower lycopene and beta-carotene contents.

Treatment
greenhouse conditionse1
Outcome
contents in lycopene and -carotenee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower contents in lycopene and -carotene than those from OF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“breeding programs specifically focused to adaptation to greenhouse conditions should be developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2315 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA separated varieties by cultivation environment.

Outcome
separated varietiese0
Comparator
cultivation environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A principal components analysis clearly separated varieties according to the cultivation environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within each environment cluster, variety distribution was similar.

Outcome
distribution pattern of varietiese0
Qualifier
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the distribution pattern of varieties within each of the two clusters (GH and OF) was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces of shared origin clustered together.

Material
Landracese0
Outcome
plotted in the same area of each clustere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Landraces from the same origin plotted in the same area of each cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–1932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selections and hybrids clustered with landraces.

Material
selections and hybridse0
Outcome
plotted together with the landracese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selections and hybrids plotted together with the landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–1996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend breeding for greenhouse adaptation.

Outcome
breeding programs specifically focused to adaptation to greenhouse conditions should be developede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“breeding programs specifically focused to adaptation to greenhouse conditions should be developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.