Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Agronomic Comparisons of Heirloom and Modern Processing Tomato Genotypes Cultivated in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems

Domenico Ronga; Federica Caradonia; Antonella Vitti; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The yield and fruit quality of processing tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) have increased markedly over the past decades. The aim of this work was to assess the effects of the organic (OFS) and conventional farming systems (CFS) on the main agronomic parameters involved in processing tomato yield components and fruit quality traits of heirloom and modern genotypes. Marketable yield increased from heirloom to modern genotypes, both in OFS and in CFS, showing a difference of ≈20 t per hectare in favor of CFS. Total fruit yield (TY) was not improved from heirloom to modern assessed genotypes, and a difference of ≈35 t per hectare was observed in favor of CFS. In both farming systems, the highest marketable yield of modern genotypes was due to a higher number of fruits per plant, harvest index, nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE), and fruit water productivity. Moreover, the main growth parameters involved in the yield differences between OFS and CFS were the number of leaves per plant, the average fruit weight, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and NAE. It is noteworthy that fruit quality improvement in terms of color and brix per hectare was paralleled by a decrease of tomato pH in both farming systems. According to our results, we conclude that to reduce the current yield gap between OFS and CFS, agronomic and breeding efforts should be undertaken to increase leaf area index, fruit number per plant, and NAE for better genotype adaptation to organic farming systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield rose from heirloom to modern genotypes in both systems.

Material
modern genotypese0
Outcome
Marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
heirloome0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield increased from heirloom to modern genotypes, both in OFS and in CFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional farming had about 20 t per hectare higher marketable yield.

Treatment
CFSe0
Outcome
Marketable yielde1
Direction
in favor ofe0
Value
≈20 t per hectaree0
Comparator
OFSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showing a difference of ≈20 t per hectare in favor of CFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Marketable yield increased from heirloom to modern genotypes, both in OFS and in CFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fruit yield did not improve between heirloom and modern genotypes.

Material
modern assessed genotypese0
Outcome
Total fruit yielde0
Direction
not improvede0
Comparator
heirloome0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield (TY) was not improved from heirloom to modern assessed genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional farming had about 35 t per hectare higher total yield.

Treatment
CFSe0
Outcome
Total fruit yielde1
Direction
in favor ofe0
Value
≈35 t per hectaree0
Comparator
OFSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a difference of ≈35 t per hectare was observed in favor of CFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total fruit yield (TY) was not improved from heirloom to modern assessed genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–597 · show in text ↑
e2

“both in OFS and in CFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern genotypes had more fruits per plant and higher harvest index, NAE and water productivity.

Material
modern genotypese0
Outcome
number of fruits per plant, harvest index, nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE), and fruit water productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest marketable yield of modern genotypes was due to a higher number of fruits per plant, harvest index, nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE), and fruit water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number, fruit weight, NDVI and NAE accounted for yield differences between farming systems.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Qualifier
number of leaves per plant, the average fruit weight, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and NAEe0
Comparator
OFS and CFSe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main growth parameters involved in the yield differences between OFS and CFS were the number of leaves per plant, the average fruit weight, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and NAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit color and brix per hectare improved.

Outcome
color and brix per hectaree0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit quality improvement in terms of color and brix per hectare was paralleled by a decrease of tomato pH in both farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato pH decreased in both systems.

Outcome
tomato pHe0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease of tomato pH in both farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend increasing leaf area index, fruit number and NAE to narrow the organic yield gap.

Outcome
increase leaf area index, fruit number per plant, and NAEe0
Qualifier
better genotype adaptation to organic farming systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to reduce the current yield gap between OFS and CFS, agronomic and breeding efforts should be undertaken to increase leaf area index, fruit number per plant, and NAE for better genotype adaptation to organic farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.