Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Symbiotic Effectivity of Dual and Tripartite Associations on Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Cultivars Inoculated With Bradyrhizobium japonicum and AM Fungi

Tünde Takács; Imre Cseresnyés; Ramóna Kovács; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
50
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is regarded worldwide as indisputably one of the most important crops for human food and animal feed. The presence of symbiotic bacteria and fungi is essential for soybean breeding, especially in low-input agricultural systems. Research on the cooperation between different microbial symbionts is a key to understanding how the health and productivity of the plant is supported. The symbiotic effectivity of dual and tripartite symbiotic agents was investigated in two pot experiments on different soybean cultivars with special regard to compatibility. In the Selection experiment, two out of sixteen soybean cultivars (Aliz, Emese) were chosen on the basis of their drought tolerance and used in all the other investigations. In the Compatibility experiment, the compatible coupling of symbiotic partners was selected based on the efficiency of single and co-inoculation with two Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains and two commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) products. Significant differences were found in the infectivity and effectivity of the microsymbionts. The rhizobial and AMF inoculation generally improved plant production, photosynthetic efficiency and root activity, but this effect depended on the type of symbiotic assotiation. Despite the low infectivity of AMF, inocula containing fungi were more beneficial than those containing only rhizobia. In the Drought Stress (DS) experiment, co-inoculated and control plants were grown in chernozem soil originating from organic farms. Emese was more resistant to drought stress than Aliz and produced a bigger root system. Under DS, the growth parameters of both microbially inoculated cultivars were better than that of control, proving that even drought tolerant genotypes can strengthen their endurance due to inoculation with AMF and nitrogen fixing bacteria. Root electrical capacitance (C R ) showed a highly significant linear correlation with root and shoot dry mass and leaf area. The same root biomass was associated with higher C R in inoculated hosts. As C R method detects the absorptive surface increasing due to inoculation, it may be used to check the efficiency of the microbial treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infectivity and effectivity of the microsymbionts differed significantly.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Interactor
microsymbiontse2symbiont
Outcome
infectivity and effectivity of the microsymbiontse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Significant differences were found in the infectivity and effectivity of the microsymbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial and AMF inoculation generally improved plant production, photosynthetic efficiency and root activity of soybean.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
rhizobial and AMF inoculatione3
Interactor
AMFe3symbiont
Outcome
plant production, photosynthetic efficiency and root activitye3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The rhizobial and AMF inoculation generally improved plant production, photosynthetic efficiency and root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inocula containing fungi were more beneficial to soybean than inocula containing only rhizobia.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
inocula containing fungie4
Interactor
AMFe4symbiont
Outcome
beneficiale4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
those containing only rhizobiae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Despite the low infectivity of AMF, inocula containing fungi were more beneficial than those containing only rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emese was more resistant to drought stress than Aliz.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Material
Emesee5
Outcome
resistant to drought stresse5
Direction
moree5
Comparator
Alize5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Emese was more resistant to drought stress than Aliz and produced a bigger root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1621 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emese produced a bigger root system than Aliz.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Material
Emesee5
Outcome
root systeme5
Direction
biggere5
Comparator
Alize5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Emese was more resistant to drought stress than Aliz and produced a bigger root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1621 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, both microbially inoculated soybean cultivars had better growth parameters than the control.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
inoculation with AMF and nitrogen fixing bacteriae6
Interactor
AMFe6symbiont
Second interactor
nitrogen fixing bacteriae6symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse6
Direction
bettere6
Qualifier
Under DSe6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Under DS, the growth parameters of both microbially inoculated cultivars were better than that of control, proving that even drought tolerant genotypes can strengthen their endurance due to inoculation with AMF and nitrogen fixing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1862 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root electrical capacitance showed a highly significant linear correlation with root and shoot dry mass and leaf area.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Organ / stage
root and shoote7
Outcome
Root electrical capacitance (C R )e7
Qualifier
linear correlation with root and shoot dry mass and leaf areae7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Root electrical capacitance (C R ) showed a highly significant linear correlation with root and shoot dry mass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1988 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same root biomass was associated with higher root electrical capacitance in inoculated soybean.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
inoculated hostse0
Outcome
C Re0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same root biomass was associated with higher C R in inoculated hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2062 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root electrical capacitance method detects an increase in absorptive surface due to inoculation.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
absorptive surfacee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As C R method detects the absorptive surface increasing due to inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 79 positive, 8 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 117 positive, 36 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.