Abstract
A field experiment was carried out to study the zinc-iron relationship in wheat (BARI Gom-26) plant grown under water stress condition in the field near net house of Soil Science Division, BARI, Joydebpur, Gazipur, during November 2015 to March 2016. The experiment was designed in a split plot on sixteen treatments comprising four irrigation treatments (regular irrigation, stopping irrigation at crown root initiation, stopping irrigation at booting stage and stopping irrigation at grain filling stage) and four foliar application of zinc and iron (control, 0.05% of zinc, 0.05% of iron and 0.05% of zinc +0.05% of iron). Zinc sulphate monohydrate (ZnSO4. H2O) and ferrous sulphate (FeSO4. H2O) were used as a source of Zn and Fe. The highest yield (4.01 t ha-1) was recorded in stopping irrigation at grain filling stage which was identical with regular irrigation. Water stress at crown root initiation stage had the most negative effect on growth and yield. Foliar application of zinc and iron played a major role on yield and yield components of wheat at later stages of growth. The results obtained from the present research showed that iron and zinc spray increased grain yield and quality of wheat and improved the effects caused by drought stress.Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 43(3): 395-406, September 2018
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Stopping irrigation at grain filling produced the highest yield, 4.01 t ha-1, statistically identical to regular irrigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- stopping irrigation at grain filling stagee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.01 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- regular irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield (4.01 t ha-1) was recorded in stopping irrigation at grain filling stage which was identical with regular irrigation”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress at crown root initiation had the most negative effect on wheat growth and yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Water stress at crown root initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- most negativee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress at crown root initiation stage had the most negative effect on growth and yield”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar iron and zinc increased wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- iron and zinc spraye0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron and zinc spray increased grain yield and quality of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar iron and zinc increased wheat grain quality.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- iron and zinc spraye0
- Outcome
- quality of wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron and zinc spray increased grain yield and quality of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar iron and zinc ameliorated effects of drought stress.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- iron and zinc spraye0
- Outcome
- effects caused by drought stresse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron and zinc spray increased grain yield and quality of wheat and improved the effects caused by drought stress”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →iron atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →application · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
628 papers more in this group
See all 632 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.