Abstract
-1 ) which was significantly higher than the other two cultivars. Wheat crop supplied with five irrigations at crown root + tillering + booting + earing + milking recorded the highest grain yield (5696.8 kg ha -1 ) which was significantly higher than all the other irrigation levels. At highest irrigation level I5, cultivars AS-2002 and SH-2002 produced grain yield at par but significantly higher than Aqab-2000. At all the other irrigation levels, cultivar AS2002 recorded significantly higher grain yield than the other two cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Five irrigations produced the highest grain yield, 5696.8 kg ha -1, above all other levels.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- five irrigations at crown root + tillering + booting + earing + milkinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5696.8 kg ha -1e0
- Comparator
- all the other irrigation levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat crop supplied with five irrigations at crown root + tillering + booting + earing + milking recorded the highest grain yield (5696.8 kg ha -1 ) which was significantly higher than all the other irrigation levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
At I5, AS-2002 and SH-2002 yields were at par.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AS-2002e0
- Treatment
- highest irrigation level I5e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- SH-2002e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At highest irrigation level I5, cultivars AS-2002 and SH-2002 produced grain yield at par”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
At I5, AS-2002 and SH-2002 yielded significantly more than Aqab-2000.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AS-2002 and SH-2002e0
- Treatment
- highest irrigation level I5e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Aqab-2000e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At highest irrigation level I5, cultivars AS-2002 and SH-2002 produced grain yield at par but significantly higher than Aqab-2000.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
At other irrigation levels, AS2002 yielded significantly more than the other cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AS2002e0
- Treatment
- all the other irrigation levelse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the other two cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At all the other irrigation levels, cultivar AS2002 recorded significantly higher grain yield than the other two cultivars.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.