Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of sowing date and weed management on productivity and economics of rainfed mungbean (Vigna radiata)

TIRYAK KUMAR SAMANT; TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY

16
claims
40
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2013 and 2014 at Angul, Odisha, to study the effect of sowing date and weed management on crop growth, yield, weed control, economics and nutrient up- take of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]. The experiment consisted of 3 sowing date and 6 weed manage- ment treatments. The pooled results revealed that, the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%). Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18). The same treatment also recorded the maximum weed control efficiency (87.9%), which resulted in significant reduction in both weed density (38.0/m2) and weed dry weight (28.6 g/m2). In contrast to nutrient uptake by mungbean crop, the decreased nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds was recorded upto to 88.5% under weed management treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing mungbean on June 20 significantly increased seed yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
the crop sown on June 20e2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
1.0 t/hae2
Setting
Angul, Odishae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Angul, Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing mungbean on June 20 significantly increased net returns to 26,100/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
the crop sown on June 20e2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
26,100/hae2
Setting
Angul, Odishae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Angul, Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing mungbean on June 20 significantly increased weed control efficiency to 68.1%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
the crop sown on June 20e2
Outcome
weed control efficiencye2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
68.1%e2
Setting
Angul, Odishae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Angul, Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing mungbean on June 20 significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation and seeds per pod.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
the crop sown on June 20e2
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pode2
Direction
significantly highere2
Setting
Angul, Odishae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Angul, Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing mungbean on June 20 significantly increased nodules per plant.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
the crop sown on June 20e2
Outcome
nodules/plante2
Direction
significantly highere2
Setting
Angul, Odishae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop sown on June 20, resulted significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, seed yield (1.0 t/ha), net returns ( 26,100/ha) and weed control efficiency (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Angul, Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 100 g/ha at 20 DAS followed by one hand-weeding at 40 DAS significantly increased mungbean seed yield to 1.17 t/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DASe4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
1.17 t/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased harvest index to 29.7%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
harvest indexe4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
29.7%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased monetary returns to 872/ha/day.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
monetary returnse4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
872/ha/daye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased the benefit:cost ratio to 2.18.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
2.18e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding gave the maximum weed control efficiency of 87.9%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
weed control efficiencye5
Direction
maximume5
Value
87.9%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
e5

“The same treatment also recorded the maximum weed control efficiency (87.9%), which resulted in significant reduction in both weed density (38.0/m2) and weed dry weight (28.6 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly reduced weed density to 38.0/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
weed densitye5
Direction
significant reductione5
Value
38.0/m2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
e5

“The same treatment also recorded the maximum weed control efficiency (87.9%), which resulted in significant reduction in both weed density (38.0/m2) and weed dry weight (28.6 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly reduced weed dry weight to 28.6 g/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
weed dry weighte5
Direction
significant reductione5
Value
28.6 g/m2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
e5

“The same treatment also recorded the maximum weed control efficiency (87.9%), which resulted in significant reduction in both weed density (38.0/m2) and weed dry weight (28.6 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management decreased nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds by up to 88.5%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
weed management treatmentse6
Interactor
weedse6weed
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weedse6
Direction
decreasede6
Value
88.5%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e6

“In contrast to nutrient uptake by mungbean crop, the decreased nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds was recorded upto to 88.5% under weed management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation and dry matter efficiency.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiencye4
Direction
significantly highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased pods per plant, seeds per pod and nodules per plant.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plante4
Direction
significantly highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly increased nodule dry weight.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
nodules dry weighte4
Direction
significantly highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Imazethapyr · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

sowing time · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.