Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Arjun Ram A. K. Thakur; M. Kumar T. Chandrakar; D. P. Singh

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted at Instructional cum Research Farm, S.G. College of Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur, Dist-Bastar (C.G.) during summer season 2021. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RBD) with three replication and consists of eight treatments. The soil of experimental field was Inceptisols, with acidic in reaction (pH-7.1), organic carbon was medium, available N was low and available P and K was medium. Result revealed that two hand weeding highest significantly in plant height, grain yield, gross return, net return and B:C ratio to other herbicide treatments. A non significant difference between plat emergences, haulm yield and harvest index were observed. Form the study it can be concluded that farmers can go for post emergence application of Sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargy 8% (165+80 g ha-1) for better weed management and higher seed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced significantly greater plant height than herbicide treatments.

Taxon
Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hand weeding highest significantly in plant height, grain yield, gross return, net return and B:C ratio to other herbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced significantly greater grain yield than herbicide treatments.

Taxon
Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hand weeding highest significantly in plant height, grain yield, gross return, net return and B:C ratio to other herbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced significantly greater gross return, net return, and benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
gross return, net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hand weeding highest significantly in plant height, grain yield, gross return, net return and B:C ratio to other herbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant emergence, haulm yield, and harvest index did not differ significantly.

Taxon
Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Outcome
plat emergences, haulm yield and harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A non significant difference between plat emergences, haulm yield and harvest index were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend postemergence sodium acifluorfen plus clodinafop for weed management and higher seed yield.

Taxon
Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
post emergence application of Sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargy 8% (165+80 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
better weed management and higher seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers can go for post emergence application of Sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargy 8% (165+80 g ha-1) for better weed management and higher seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.