Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Morpho-Physiological Response and Production Potential of Promising Mungbean Cultivars under Varying Planting Dates

Abdul Mannan; Muhammad Bilal Chattha; Mubeen Sarwar

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Optimization of planting dates under any climatic conditions is pre-requisite to improve the yield and quality of the major and minor crops. This study was conducted to evaluate the potential of various mungbean cultivars for morpho-physiological and yield traits under different planting dates. In this pot study twenty mungbean cultivars (MGP-17, DM-D4, C5/95-3-31, C6/95-3-8, 5-63-94, TM-1407, MGP-01, NM-11, MGP-41, 5-63-1, MGP-16, NM20-21, MUNG-88, NM-121-25, RAMZAN, NM-2016, NM-19-19, 1099, NM-51 and NM13-1) were planted on July 01 and August 01. Results revealed that various planting dates significantly affected all the attributes, however, genotypic variation was observed among the cultivars. Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%). Likely, gas exchange traits including photosynthetic rate (15.71%), transpiration rate (17.09%), sub-stomatal CO 2 concentration (2.39%), stomatal conductance (30.56%), SPAD chlorophyll contents (7.42%) and water use efficiency (3.28%) were also reduced. Among morphological traits, various planting dates also reduced the number of pods per plant (5.04%), length of the pod (5.69%), number of grains per pod (28.68%) and 1000-grains weight (7.05%). Differential responses of all the mungbean cultivars were observed for all the pragmatic traits. Delayed planting significantly reduced the morpho-physiological and yield attributes of all mungbean cultivars. However, two mungbean cultivars (NM-121-25 and NM-2016) relatively performed better with minimum reductions in growth, yield and physiological attributes even in delayed planting while the DM-D4 and TM-1407 were found to be the most sensitive in delayed planting than other tested cultivars. Therefore, mungbean cultivars NM-121-25 and NM-2016 can be sown in late sown conditions to get higher yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting dates significantly affected measured attributes, with variation among cultivars.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
various planting datese0
Outcome
all the attributese0

Verbatim

e0

“various planting dates significantly affected all the attributes, however, genotypic variation was observed among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced mean germination time by 1.90%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
mean germination timee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced germination index by 3.10%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
germination indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced final germination percentage by 7.34%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
final germination percentagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced shoot length by 14.88%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced root length by 23.31%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced number of leaves by 23.04%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced leaf area by 5.74%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced number of nodules by 13.02%.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed planting reduced the stand establishment attributes as mean germination time (1.90%), germination index (3.10%), final germination percentage (7.34%), seedling growth including shoot length (14.88%), root length (23.31%), number of leaves (23.04%), leaf area (5.74%) and number of nodules (13.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–1012 · show in text ↑

sowing time · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.