Abstract
Mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek, Fabaceae] is one of the most important food legume crops in Asia. It is also gaining importance in other parts of the world such as Australia and Canada. The United States imported mungbean worth ≈22 million dollars during 2014. To establish domestic production and to determine if mungbean can be produced in rotation with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), replicated experiments were conducted during 2012 and 2013 using two cultivars (Berken and TexSprout), two planting dates (early and late July), and two row spacings (37.5 and 75 cm). Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant, however, narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein). Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil). Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively. Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield. The results indicated that mungbean can be easily produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar did not significantly affect seed yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date did not significantly affect seed yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Narrow spacing increased seed yield to 1.76 versus 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1.
- Treatment
- narrow row spacinge0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1e0
- Comparator
- wider row spacinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein).”
Claim · model-written summary
Narrow spacing increased protein concentration to 24.9% versus 23.7%.
- Treatment
- narrow row spacinge0
- Outcome
- concentration of proteine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 24.9% vs. 23.7%e0
- Comparator
- wider row spacinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein).”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting lowered sugar concentration to 4.4% versus 5.5%.
- Treatment
- Early plantinge0
- Outcome
- sugare0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 4.4% vs. 5.5%e0
- Comparator
- late plantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil).”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting lowered oil concentration to 1.24% versus 1.99%.
- Treatment
- Early plantinge0
- Outcome
- oil concentrationse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 1.24% vs. 1.99%e0
- Comparator
- late plantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil).”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed yield was 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Value
- 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed size was 7.08 g/seed 100.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- seed sizee0
- Value
- 7.08 g/seed 100e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed protein concentration was 24.3%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- proteine0
- Value
- 24.3%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed sugar concentration was 4.91%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- sugarse0
- Value
- 4.91%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seed oil concentration was 1.59%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- oile0
- Value
- 1.59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index ranged from 17% to 25%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Value
- 17% to 25%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Low harvest index suggested scope to improve mungbean yield.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- improvement in mungbean seed yielde0
- Qualifier
- Low harvest index valuese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded mungbean can be produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid Atlantic United States.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- produced in rotation with winter wheate0
- Setting
- mid-Atlantic region of the United Statese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“mungbean can be easily produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.