Paper · 2015 · HortScience

Cultivar, Planting Date, and Row Spacing Effects on Mungbean Performance in Virginia

Harbans L. Bhardwaj; Anwar A. Hamama

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek, Fabaceae] is one of the most important food legume crops in Asia. It is also gaining importance in other parts of the world such as Australia and Canada. The United States imported mungbean worth ≈22 million dollars during 2014. To establish domestic production and to determine if mungbean can be produced in rotation with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), replicated experiments were conducted during 2012 and 2013 using two cultivars (Berken and TexSprout), two planting dates (early and late July), and two row spacings (37.5 and 75 cm). Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant, however, narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein). Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil). Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively. Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield. The results indicated that mungbean can be easily produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar did not significantly affect seed yield.

Treatment
Cultivare0
Outcome
seed yielde0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date did not significantly affect seed yield.

Treatment
planting datee0
Outcome
seed yielde0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar and planting date effects on seed yield were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing increased seed yield to 1.76 versus 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1.

Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1e0
Comparator
wider row spacinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing increased protein concentration to 24.9% versus 23.7%.

Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
concentration of proteine0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.9% vs. 23.7%e0
Comparator
wider row spacinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“narrow row spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield and concentration of protein over the wider row spacing (1.76 vs. 0.86 Mg⋅ha −1 yield and 24.9% vs. 23.7% protein).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting lowered sugar concentration to 4.4% versus 5.5%.

Treatment
Early plantinge0
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4.4% vs. 5.5%e0
Comparator
late plantinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting lowered oil concentration to 1.24% versus 1.99%.

Treatment
Early plantinge0
Outcome
oil concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.24% vs. 1.99%e0
Comparator
late plantinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Early planting resulted in lower sugar and oil concentrations over late planting (4.4% vs. 5.5% sugar and 1.24% vs. 1.99% oil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed yield was 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
1.31 Mg⋅ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed size was 7.08 g/seed 100.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
seed sizee0
Value
7.08 g/seed 100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed protein concentration was 24.3%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
proteine0
Value
24.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed sugar concentration was 4.91%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
sugarse0
Value
4.91%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed oil concentration was 1.59%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
oile0
Value
1.59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average mungbean values for seed yield, seed size, and concentrations of protein, sugars, and oil were 1.31 Mg⋅ha −1 , 7.08 g/seed 100 , 24.3%, 4.91%, and 1.59%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index ranged from 17% to 25%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Value
17% to 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1258 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low harvest index suggested scope to improve mungbean yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
improvement in mungbean seed yielde0
Qualifier
Low harvest index valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low harvest index values (17% to 25%) indicated that potential exists for improvement in mungbean seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1258 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded mungbean can be produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid Atlantic United States.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
produced in rotation with winter wheate0
Setting
mid-Atlantic region of the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean can be easily produced in rotation with winter wheat in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1396 · show in text ↑

density · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.