Paper · 2018 · Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection

Effect of Nitrogen and Water Management on Methane Emission of Boro Rice Cultivation in Bangladesh

Israt Zahan; Shahadat Hossen; Akhter Hossain Chowdhury; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water and nitrogen are two key elements required for successful rice cultivation. We examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice in the field laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University research farm, Mymensingh. Three treatments were studied in the field experiment viz, T1: Control plot (no nitrogen fertilizer), T2: Urea super granule (78 kg N/ha), T3: Prilled urea (104 kg N/ha) with three replications under two water management of Continuous Standing Water (CSW) and Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD). Air samples were collected by the closed-chamber method and methane gas was determined by gas chromatography. The highest CH4 emission was found from CSW plots and the lowest from AWD plots. Under CSW condition, the effects of urea treatments on CH4 emission were not significant. In case of urea treatments, the highest CH4 emission was observed from treatment T3 under CSW condition and T2 under AWD condition and the lowest emission was from the control treatment. The overall results suggest that prilled urea and urea super granule should be applied under AWD and CSW condition, respectively to keep less CH4 emission from irrigated rice agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methane emission was highest under continuous standing water (CSW) compared with alternate wetting and drying (AWD).

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
CSWe4
Outcome
CH4 emissione4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
AWDe4

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest CH4 emission was found from CSW plots and the lowest from AWD plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methane emission was lowest under alternate wetting and drying (AWD) compared with continuous standing water (CSW).

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
AWDe4
Outcome
CH4 emissione4
Direction
loweste4
Comparator
CSWe4

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest CH4 emission was found from CSW plots and the lowest from AWD plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under CSW, the effects of urea treatments on CH4 emission were not significant.

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
urea treatmentse5
Outcome
CH4 emissione5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Qualifier
Under CSW conditione5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under CSW condition, the effects of urea treatments on CH4 emission were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under CSW, T3 (prilled urea) gave the highest CH4 emission among the urea treatments.

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
Prilled urea (104 kg N/ha)e2
Outcome
CH4 emissione6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
under CSW conditione6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e2

“T3: Prilled urea (104 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–432 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest CH4 emission was observed from treatment T3 under CSW condition and T2 under AWD condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AWD, T2 (urea super granule) gave the highest CH4 emission among the urea treatments.

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
Urea super granule (78 kg N/ha)e1
Outcome
CH4 emissione6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
under AWD conditione6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e1

“T2: Urea super granule (78 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–400 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest CH4 emission was observed from treatment T3 under CSW condition and T2 under AWD condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control treatment gave the lowest emission among the treatments.

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
control treatmente7
Outcome
emissione7
Direction
loweste7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e7

“the lowest emission was from the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1025 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying prilled urea under AWD and urea super granule under CSW to keep CH4 emission low in irrigated rice.

Taxon
Boro ricee0
Treatment
prilled urea and urea super granulee1
Outcome
CH4 emissione1
Qualifier
under AWD and CSW condition, respectivelye1

Verbatim

e0

“examined the responses of nitrogen and water management on methane emission of Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–173 · show in text ↑
e1

“prilled urea and urea super granule should be applied under AWD and CSW condition, respectively to keep less CH4 emission from irrigated rice agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1213 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.