Abstract
Background and Objective: Sugar beet is one of the cash crops grown in temperate and cold zones of the world. In Egypt, it thrives in the northern part of the country. It comprises about 30% of total sugar production. Both foliage and pulps are feed of high value for the domestic animals. Since several soil-borne fungi attack this crop causing a significant reduction in the production, the present investigation aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of selected antioxidants including GAWDA formulation along with Trichoderma fungus and organic fertilizers (compost) to induce resistance against the root rot disease along with their possible role on increasing the yield and quality. Materials and Methods: In vitro studies were carried out to select the efficient concentration of the tested antioxidants on reducing the growth of the target pathogens. In vivo studies were applied in the field plots at Mansoura University Campus during the two successful seasons of 2015 and 2016. The growth parameters as well as the root weight and their quality characters were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed by CoStat 6.3 software of analysis of variance at p<0.05 as outlined by Duncan. Results: Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residues significantly decreased the damping-off disease and scaled up the yield and quality. Conclusion: Results addresses a ramping up in the yield and quality of sugar beet as well as control damping-off disease when treated with friendly environmental materials.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly decreased sugar beet damping-off disease.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residuese0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma harazianume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- damping-off diseasee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residues significantly decreased the damping-off disease”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment increased sugar beet yield.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residuese0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma harazianume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- scaled upe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residues significantly decreased the damping-off disease and scaled up the yield and quality”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved sugar beet quality.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residuese0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma harazianume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- scaled upe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soaking seeds in water solution of GAWDA formulation at a concentration of 4 g LG 1 for 12 hours before planting and air dried for 1 h followed by coating them with Trichoderma harazianum (T. harazianum) before planting in soil supplemented with the composted agricultural residues significantly decreased the damping-off disease and scaled up the yield and quality”
t0“Sugar Beet”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
storage · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
processing · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →processing · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →storage · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →application · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.