Paper · 2018 · Soil & Environment

Improvement in phosphorus use efficiency of corn crop by amending the soil with sulfur and farmyard manure

Abu El-Eyuoon Abu Zied Amin Amin

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of organic manure is proposed to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers, as well as to add sulfur (S) into the soil so that the phosphate use efficiency may be improved by maize crop. This field experiment was conducted during 2014 at Assiut city, Assiut governorate, Egypt to study the effect of sulfur and farmyard manure (FYM) on phosphorus availability, grain yield and phosphorus use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L. cv Single Hybrid 10). Randomized complete block design was followed with three replications. Four treatments viz SP= superphosphate, SP+S = superphosphate +sulfur, SP+FYM = superphosphate +farmyard manure and SP+FYM+S = superphosphate + farmyard manure + sulfur were tested. The soil analysis after corn harvest showed that the Olsen P of the soil improved with applying sulfur or farmyard manure and their mixture in presence of superphosphate. Adding farmyard manure with superphosphate enhanced grain yield of corn plants by 44.6% as well as the application of superphosphate with farmyard manure and sulfur increased the grain yield by 44.2% compared to the SP. The results in this study showed that amending soil by farmyard manure and sulfur with superphosphate improved phosphorus use efficiency in comparison with superphosphate alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur with superphosphate improved soil Olsen P after corn harvest.

Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
Olsen Pe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
superphosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil analysis after corn harvest showed that the Olsen P of the soil improved with applying sulfur or farmyard manure and their mixture in presence of superphosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure with superphosphate improved soil Olsen P after corn harvest.

Treatment
farmyard manuree0
Outcome
Olsen Pe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
superphosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil analysis after corn harvest showed that the Olsen P of the soil improved with applying sulfur or farmyard manure and their mixture in presence of superphosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur and farmyard manure together with superphosphate improved soil Olsen P after corn harvest.

Treatment
their mixturee0
Outcome
Olsen Pe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
superphosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil analysis after corn harvest showed that the Olsen P of the soil improved with applying sulfur or farmyard manure and their mixture in presence of superphosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure with superphosphate enhanced corn grain yield by 44.6% versus superphosphate.

Treatment
farmyard manure with superphosphatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
44.6%e0
Comparator
SPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding farmyard manure with superphosphate enhanced grain yield of corn plants by 44.6% as well as the application of superphosphate with farmyard manure and sulfur increased the grain yield by 44.2% compared to the SP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure and sulfur with superphosphate increased corn grain yield by 44.2% versus superphosphate.

Treatment
superphosphate with farmyard manure and sulfure0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.2%e0
Comparator
SPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding farmyard manure with superphosphate enhanced grain yield of corn plants by 44.6% as well as the application of superphosphate with farmyard manure and sulfur increased the grain yield by 44.2% compared to the SP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure and sulfur with superphosphate improved phosphorus use efficiency versus superphosphate alone.

Treatment
farmyard manure and sulfur with superphosphatee0
Outcome
phosphorus use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
superphosphate alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amending soil by farmyard manure and sulfur with superphosphate improved phosphorus use efficiency in comparison with superphosphate alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.