Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Weed Control Measures on Performance of Chickpea under Irrigated Condition

Santosh Kumar Dubey; Arun Kumar; Durgesh Singh; et al.

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of the year 2011-12 at Agronomy Research Farm of N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh to find out most suitable weed management practice in chickpea. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and fourteen weed control treatments, viz. pendimethalin 1000g ha-1 [Pre-emergence (PE)], pendimethalin 1000 g ha-1 (PE) followed by (fb) quizalofop-ethyl 60 g ha-1 [Post-emergence (PoE)], pendimethalin 1000g ha-1 (PE) fb clodinafop 60 g ha-1 (PoE), pendimethalin (PE) 750 g ha-1fb quizalofop-ethyl 60g + oxyfluorfen 200g ha-1 (PoE), oxyfluorfen 200g ha-1 (PE), oxyfluorfen 200g ha-1 (PE) fb quizalofop-ethyl 60g ha-1 (PoE), oxyfluorfen 200g ha-1 (PE) fb clodinafop 60g ha-1 (PoE), oxyfluorfen 200g + quizalofop-ethyl 60g/ha (PoE), oxyfluorfen 200g + clodinafop 60g ha-1 (PoE), imazethapyr 75g ha-1 (PoE), pendimethalin 1000g (PE) fb imazethapyr 75g ha-1 (PoE), pendimethalin 1000g ha-1 (PE) fb imazethapyr 75g + quizalofop-ethyl 60g ha-1 (PoE), weed free and weedy check. Results indicated that weed control treatments give significantly positive impact on number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields and economics of chickpea over weedy check at each growth stage. Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39kg/ha) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment but maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42kg/ha) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment and lowest in weed free treatment. So, adoption of suitable weed management measures can enhance the performance of crop and provide more income to farmers far achieving the goal of doubling farmer income by 2022.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased chickpea nodule number relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control treatments give significantly positive impact on number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields and economics of chickpea over weedy check at each growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased chickpea N, P and K uptake relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
nutrient (N, P, K) uptakee0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control treatments give significantly positive impact on number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields and economics of chickpea over weedy check at each growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased chickpea yield and economics relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
yields and economics of chickpeae0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control treatments give significantly positive impact on number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields and economics of chickpea over weedy check at each growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free chickpea had the maximum yield of 1.72 t ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.72 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39kg/ha) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free chickpea had maximum N uptake of 63.60 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
N-e0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
63.60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39kg/ha) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free chickpea had maximum P uptake of 9.09 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
P-e0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
9.09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39kg/ha) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free chickpea had maximum K uptake of 74.39kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
K-e0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
74.39kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39kg/ha) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy check had maximum weed N uptake of 23.22 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42kg/ha) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy check had maximum weed phosphorus uptake of 2.68 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
phosphorouse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.68e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42kg/ha) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy check had maximum weed potassium uptake of 50.42kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
maximume0
Value
50.42kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42kg/ha) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment produced the lowest weed nutrient uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Suitable weed management can improve crop performance and farmer income.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
adoption of suitable weed management measurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of suitable weed management measures can enhance the performance of crop and provide more income to farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68 · show in text ↑

herbicide · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.