Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Performance of Various Chemicals Weed Management in Chickpea an Irrigated Environment

Santosh Kumar Dubey; Ved Prakash

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea is additional sensitive to weed competition than other crops. During early stages of crop growth competition is more severe because of slow growth rate and leaf area development. Weeds have been blamed for losses in India that range from 40 to 90 percent. Thus, adopting an effective weed management strategy is the only way to significantly increase chickpea yield. The experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2011-12 at Agronomy Research Farm of NDUA&T, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with fourteen weed management treatments and replicated in thrice. According to the findings, weed management methods significantly affect the number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields, and economics of chickpea over weedy check at growth stage. Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39 kg ha -1) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment but maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42 kg ha -1) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment and lowest in weed free treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management methods significantly affected the number of nodules, nutrient uptake and yields of chickpea over the weedy check.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed management methodse1
Outcome
number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yieldse1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“weed management methods significantly affect the number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields, and economics of chickpea over weedy check at growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management methods significantly affected the economics of chickpea over the weedy check.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed management methodse1
Outcome
economicse1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“weed management methods significantly affect the number of nodules, nutrient (N, P, K) uptake, yields, and economics of chickpea over weedy check at growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed free treatment gave the maximum chickpea yield of 1.72 t ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
1.72 t ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39 kg ha -1) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed free treatment gave the maximum chickpea nitrogen uptake, N 63.60 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente2
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
N- 63.60e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39 kg ha -1) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed free treatment gave the maximum chickpea phosphorus uptake, P 9.09 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente2
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
P- 9.09e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39 kg ha -1) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed free treatment gave the maximum chickpea potassium uptake, K 74.39 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weed free treatmente2
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
K- 74.39 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (1.72 t ha-1) and nutrient uptake (N- 63.60, P- 9.09 and K- 74.39 kg ha -1) by chickpea were recorded in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check gave the maximum nitrogen uptake by weeds, 23.22 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
uptake by weede3
Direction
maximume3
Value
23.22e3
Qualifier
nitrogene3
Comparator
weed free treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“but maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42 kg ha -1) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment and lowest in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check gave the maximum phosphorus uptake by weeds, 2.68 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
uptake by weede3
Direction
maximume3
Value
2.68e3
Qualifier
phosphorouse3
Comparator
weed free treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“but maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42 kg ha -1) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment and lowest in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check gave the maximum potassium uptake by weeds, 50.42 kg ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
uptake by weede3
Direction
maximume3
Value
50.42 kg ha -1e3
Qualifier
potassiume3
Comparator
weed free treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“but maximum nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (23.22, 2.68 and 50.42 kg ha -1) uptake by weed were obtained in weedy check treatment and lowest in weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑

herbicide · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.