Abstract
In order to study the effect of planting methods and integrated nutrient management in rice. A field experiments was conducted at Agronomy Research Farm of Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (Utter Pradesh) during Kharif 2014. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with four replications. The treatment consisted of four planting methods (S1- transplanting, S2-SRI, S3- drum seeded and S4- direct seeded) and three integrated nutrient management (F1- 100% NPK, F2- 75% NPK+25% FYM and F3- 50% NPK+ 50% FYM) in this way there were 12 treatment combinations. The values of growth contributing characters viz. plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), leaf area index, and yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) and nutrient uptake of rice were increasing significantly with SRI method (S2) followed by transplanting method (S1) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments. In case of integrated nutrient management the growth characters like plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g), LAI, yield attributes’ number of panicle m-2, length of panicle, grain weight panicle-1,test weight (g), nutrient uptake, grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F2 (75% NPK+25% FYM) which was at par with F1 100% NPK during course of investigation. The maximum gross return and net return were noted under SRI with 75% NPK+25% FYM (S2F2) application. The highest benefit cost ratio (2.47) were recorded with SRI method with 100% NPK treatment (S2F1) followed by SRI with 75%NPK+25% FYM (S2F2) they proved more remunerative then other treatment combinations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
SRI increased rice growth measures and yield attributes over other planting methods.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- SRI method (S2)e0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2)e0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The values of growth contributing characters viz. plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), leaf area index, and yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) and nutrient uptake of rice were increasing significantly with SRI method (S2) followed by transplanting method (S1) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI significantly increased rice yield attributes and grain and straw yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI method (S2)e0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield (q ha-1)e0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) and nutrient uptake of rice were increasing significantly with SRI method (S2) followed by transplanting method (S1) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI increased rice nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- SRI method (S2)e0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient uptake of rice were increasing significantly with SRI method (S2) followed by transplanting method (S1) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
F2 produced maximum rice growth and yield measures, at par with F1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- F2 (75% NPK+25% FYM)e0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield (q ha-1)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- F1 100% NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth characters like plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g), LAI, yield attributes’ number of panicle m-2, length of panicle, grain weight panicle-1,test weight (g), nutrient uptake, grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F2 (75% NPK+25% FYM) which was at par with F1 100% NPK”
Claim · model-written summary
F2 produced maximum rice nutrient uptake, at par with F1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- F2 (75% NPK+25% FYM)e0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- F1 100% NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient uptake, grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F2 (75% NPK+25% FYM) which was at par with F1 100% NPK”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI with F2 gave maximum gross and net returns.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI with 75% NPK+25% FYM (S2F2)e0
- Outcome
- gross return and net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum gross return and net return were noted under SRI with 75% NPK+25% FYM (S2F2) application.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI with F1 gave the highest benefit cost ratio of 2.47.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI method with 100% NPK treatment (S2F1)e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.47e0
- Comparator
- SRI with 75%NPK+25% FYM (S2F2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest benefit cost ratio (2.47) were recorded with SRI method with 100% NPK treatment (S2F1) followed by SRI with 75%NPK+25% FYM (S2F2)”
t0“rice”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.