Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Different Postharvest Calcium Treatments and Storage Conditions on Quality of Peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab

Manpreet Singh; Amit Jasrotia; Parshant Bakshi; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A research was conducted to explore the effect of postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab, stored under ambient (28 to 30°C, 65–70% RH) and refrigerated conditions 3+2 °C and 85–90% RH in perforated polythene bags with ethylene gas absorbent viz., potassium permanganate (KMnO4). The quantitative and qualitative characteristics such as fruit volume, size (length and diameter), total sugars, reducing sugars and organoleptic evaluation i.e. sensory parameters like texture, taste, flavour and overall acceptability were studied at an interval of 3 days. It was interpreted that the loss in volume as well as size of peach fruit was reduced with the treatment of (6%) CaCl2. It also maintained the total sugar and reducing sugar contents and organoleptic quality during storage. Maximum volume (62.81 cc) was found in fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 and stored under refrigerated conditions where as it was minimum (48.09 cc) in fruits kept under controlled in untreated fruits on 24th day of storage. The fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 showed maximum size (4.34 cm), total sugars (8.93%) and reducing sugars (4.86%) content on 24th day under refrigerated conditions. Treatment 6% CaCl2 and packaging in perforated polythene bags at refrigerated temperature) retained maximum quality attributes and also got maximum score for organoleptic evaluation. Statistical analysis showed that treatments and storage intervals had a significant (P<0.05) effect on physico-chemical, characteristics and sensory analysis of peach fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6% CaCl2 reduced the loss in volume and size of peach fruit.

Treatment
(6%) CaCl2e1
Outcome
loss in volume as well as sizee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It was interpreted that the loss in volume as well as size of peach fruit was reduced with the treatment of (6%) CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 6% CaCl2 and stored refrigerated had the maximum volume, 62.81 cc, compared with untreated fruit.

Material
Shan-e-Punjabe0
Treatment
6% CaCl2e2
Outcome
volumee2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
62.81 cce2
Comparator
untreated fruitse2
Setting
refrigerated conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum volume (62.81 cc) was found in fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 and stored under refrigerated conditions where as it was minimum (48.09 cc) in fruits kept under controlled in untreated fruits on 24th day of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 6% CaCl2 reached a maximum size of 4.34 cm on day 24 under refrigeration.

Treatment
6% CaCl2e3
Outcome
sizee3
Direction
maximume3
Value
4.34 cme3
Qualifier
24th daye3
Setting
refrigerated conditionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 showed maximum size (4.34 cm), total sugars (8.93%) and reducing sugars (4.86%) content on 24th day under refrigerated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 6% CaCl2 reached a maximum total sugar content of 8.93% on day 24 under refrigeration.

Treatment
6% CaCl2e3
Outcome
total sugarse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
8.93%e3
Qualifier
24th daye3
Setting
refrigerated conditionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 showed maximum size (4.34 cm), total sugars (8.93%) and reducing sugars (4.86%) content on 24th day under refrigerated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 6% CaCl2 reached a maximum reducing sugar content of 4.86% on day 24 under refrigeration.

Treatment
6% CaCl2e3
Outcome
reducing sugarse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
4.86%e3
Qualifier
24th daye3
Setting
refrigerated conditionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fruits treated with 6% CaCl2 showed maximum size (4.34 cm), total sugars (8.93%) and reducing sugars (4.86%) content on 24th day under refrigerated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6% CaCl2 with perforated polythene bags at refrigerated temperature retained maximum quality attributes of peach.

Treatment
6% CaCl2 and packaging in perforated polythene bagse4
Outcome
quality attributese4
Direction
maximume4
Setting
refrigerated temperaturee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment 6% CaCl2 and packaging in perforated polythene bags at refrigerated temperature) retained maximum quality attributes and also got maximum score for organoleptic evaluation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

6% CaCl2 with perforated polythene bags at refrigerated temperature gave the maximum organoleptic evaluation score.

Treatment
6% CaCl2 and packaging in perforated polythene bagse4
Outcome
score for organoleptic evaluatione4
Direction
maximume4
Setting
refrigerated temperaturee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment 6% CaCl2 and packaging in perforated polythene bags at refrigerated temperature) retained maximum quality attributes and also got maximum score for organoleptic evaluation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments and storage intervals had a significant effect on the physico-chemical characteristics and sensory analysis of peach fruit.

Treatment
treatments and storage intervalse5
Outcome
physico-chemical, characteristics and sensory analysise5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest CaCl2 (2, 4 and 6%) treatments on peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“Statistical analysis showed that treatments and storage intervals had a significant (P<0.05) effect on physico-chemical, characteristics and sensory analysis of peach fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1548 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

storage · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.