Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Interrelationship between fruit quality and pre-harvest calcium chloride treatment on peach Cv. ‘Shan-I-Punjab’

R. H. S Raja; Z. A. Bhat; A. R. Malik; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effectiveness of pre-harvest calcium, chloride on post-harvest life and quality of peach fruits were studied. Calcium chloride viz. 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% was sprayed to peach plants at pit hardening stage, 10 and 20 days after pit hardening. Peach fruits harvested at physiological mature stage were sorted, washed, air dried and packed in CFB boxes before placing in cold store (temperature 0–10 and RH 85–90%). Changes in PLW, fruit firmness, sensory quality, pulp: stone, total sugars, total phenolics and calcium content were studied. Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays) resulted in minimum PLW, total sugars and maximum fruit firmness, sensory quality score, pulp: stone, total phenolics and calcium content during the stipulated storage period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three preharvest sprays of 1.5% calcium chloride produced minimum physiological weight loss and total sugars during storage.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays)e0
Outcome
PLW, total sugarse0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
during the stipulated storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays) resulted in minimum PLW, total sugars and maximum fruit firmness, sensory quality score, pulp: stone, total phenolics and calcium content during the stipulated storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach Cv. ‘Shan-I-Punjab’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three preharvest sprays of 1.5% calcium chloride produced maximum fruit firmness, sensory quality and pulp to stone ratio during storage.

Treatment
Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays)e0
Outcome
fruit firmness, sensory quality score, pulp: stonee0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
during the stipulated storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays) resulted in minimum PLW, total sugars and maximum fruit firmness, sensory quality score, pulp: stone, total phenolics and calcium content during the stipulated storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach Cv. ‘Shan-I-Punjab’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three preharvest sprays of 1.5% calcium chloride produced maximum total phenolics and calcium content during storage.

Treatment
Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays)e0
Outcome
total phenolics and calcium contente0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
during the stipulated storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride @ 1.5% (three sprays) resulted in minimum PLW, total sugars and maximum fruit firmness, sensory quality score, pulp: stone, total phenolics and calcium content during the stipulated storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach Cv. ‘Shan-I-Punjab’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.