Abstract
The experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of sheep manure (SM), its application timing (AT) and N fertilizer (urea) on dry matter partitioning and harvest index of maize crop. The study was conducted on RCBD split plots arrangement at Agronomic research farm during 2015. The Sheep manure (SM1= 3 t ha -1 , SM2= 4 t ha -1 , SM3=5 t ha -1 ) and application timing (AT1= 15 days before sowing, AT2= at sowing time) were allotted to main plots however, fertilizer N (N1= 0 kg ha -1 , N2= 90 kg ha -1 , N3= 120 kg ha -1 ) were applied to sub-plots. Application of 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced pre tesseling (stem and leaves) and physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains), dry matter partitioning and harvest index. Pre tassel and at physiological maturity dry matter accumulation were higher with application of 120 kg N ha -1 . However, application of 5 t sheep manure ha -1 at 15 days before sowing and 120 kg N ha -1 is recommended for higher dry matter accumulation of maize crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 5 t ha -1 sheep manure 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced stem and leaf dry matter before tasseling.
- Treatment
- 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowinge0
- Outcome
- pre tesseling (stem and leaves)e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced pre tesseling (stem and leaves) and physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains), dry matter partitioning and harvest index”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The same manure treatment significantly enhanced dry matter in stems, leaves, cobs and grains at physiological maturity.
- Treatment
- 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowinge0
- Outcome
- physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains)e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced pre tesseling (stem and leaves) and physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains), dry matter partitioning and harvest index”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The manure treatment significantly enhanced dry matter partitioning.
- Treatment
- 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowinge0
- Outcome
- dry matter partitioninge0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced pre tesseling (stem and leaves) and physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains), dry matter partitioning and harvest index”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The manure treatment significantly enhanced harvest index.
- Treatment
- 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowinge0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of 5 t ha -1 of sheep manure at 15 days before sowing significantly enhanced pre tesseling (stem and leaves) and physiological maturity (stem, leaves, cobs and grains), dry matter partitioning and harvest index”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
At pre-tassel stage, 120 kg N ha -1 increased dry matter accumulation.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pre tassel and at physiological maturity dry matter accumulation were higher with application of 120 kg N ha -1”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
At physiological maturity, 120 kg N ha -1 increased dry matter accumulation.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pre tassel and at physiological maturity dry matter accumulation were higher with application of 120 kg N ha -1”
t0“maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 5 t sheep manure ha -1 before sowing with 120 kg N ha -1 for higher maize dry matter accumulation.
- Outcome
- application of 5 t sheep manure ha -1 at 15 days before sowing and 120 kg N ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of 5 t sheep manure ha -1 at 15 days before sowing and 120 kg N ha -1 is recommended for higher dry matter accumulation of maize crop”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.