Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Evaluation of Agronomic Performance of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Different Rates of Poultry Manure Application in an Ultisol of Obubra, Cross River State, Nigeria

Agba Oliver Akongwubel; Ubi Benjamin Ewa; Abam Prince; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at the Teaching and Research farm of the Cross River University of Technology, Obubra Campus, Nigeria, during the 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons to determine the agronomic performance of maize under different rates of poultry manure (PM) application. Ten rates of PM treatments consisting of 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 t/ha were used in this study. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. PM application significantly improved maize vegetative growth, biomass, yield components and grain yield. The use of 20 t/ha PM gave the highest maize plant height, stem diameter and number of leaves per plant; while the best 1000-seed weights of 273.5 and 270.7 g, as well as grain yields of 2.78 and 2.89 t/ha were obtained with the application of 18 t/ha PM in 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons, respectively. Moreover, all the evaluated traits were strongly positively correlated with each other (P < 0.0001). Our results indicated that while high rates of PM linearly improved growth attributes up to the highest rate of PM treatment (20 t/ ha), a dose of 18 t/ha applied two weeks before planting was best for maize production in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure significantly improved maize vegetative growth, biomass, yield components and grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PM applicatione0
Outcome
vegetative growth, biomass, yield components and grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM application significantly improved maize vegetative growth, biomass, yield components and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 t/ha manure rate gave the greatest maize plant height, stem diameter and leaf number.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
20 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter and number of leaves per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of 20 t/ha PM gave the highest maize plant height, stem diameter and number of leaves per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 18 t/ha rate produced 273.5 g 1000-seed weight in 2005.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
18 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
1000-seed weightse0
Direction
beste0
Value
273.5e0
Qualifier
2005e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best 1000-seed weights of 273.5 and 270.7 g, as well as grain yields of 2.78 and 2.89 t/ha were obtained with the application of 18 t/ha PM in 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 18 t/ha rate produced 270.7 g 1000-seed weight in 2006.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
18 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
1000-seed weightse0
Direction
beste0
Value
270.7 ge0
Qualifier
2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best 1000-seed weights of 273.5 and 270.7 g, as well as grain yields of 2.78 and 2.89 t/ha were obtained with the application of 18 t/ha PM in 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 18 t/ha rate produced 2.78 t/ha grain yield in 2005.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
18 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
2.78e0
Qualifier
2005e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields of 2.78 and 2.89 t/ha were obtained with the application of 18 t/ha PM in 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 18 t/ha rate produced 2.89 t/ha grain yield in 2006.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
18 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
2.89 t/hae0
Qualifier
2006e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields of 2.78 and 2.89 t/ha were obtained with the application of 18 t/ha PM in 2005 and 2006 cropping seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Evaluated maize traits were strongly positively correlated.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
evaluated traitse0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
P < 0.0001e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the evaluated traits were strongly positively correlated with each other (P < 0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 18 t/ha applied two weeks before planting as best for maize production locally.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
18 t/ha applied two weeks before planting was best for maize productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a dose of 18 t/ha applied two weeks before planting was best for maize production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1229 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.