Paper · 2017 · Food Science and Technology International

Delaying microbial proliferation in freshly peeled shallots by active packaging incorporating ethanol vapour-controlled release sachets and low storage temperature

Weerawate Utto; Rittirong Preutikul; Patcharee Malila; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted to investigate effects of ethanol vapour released in active packaging and storage temperatures on the quality of freshly peeled shallots. The package tested was a solid polypropylene tray incorporating an ethanol vapour-controlled release sachet. The sachet was made of an aluminium foil film on one side and either low-density polyethylene or nylon/polyethylene on the other. Individual sachets contained silica gel adsorbent as the carrier pre-loaded with ethanol. One sachet was placed in each tray containing the peeled shallots and the tray was heat sealed with the low-density polyethylene film lid. Packages were stored at either 10 or 25 ℃ for 10 d. Trays containing only peeled shallots were designated as controls. High storage temperature stimulated quality changes in the shallots. Although ethanol vapour accumulated in the active package headspace, the extent to which ethanol concentrations increased within the shallots was not significantly different from that in the control packages. Microbial proliferation in terms of yeast and mould counts could be delayed through a combination of 10 ℃ and ethanol vapour released from the low-density polyethylene sachet. The ethanol vapour accumulated in the packages did not have a significant effect on mass loss, firmness, and colour changes in the peeled shallots, or on the concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the packages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High storage temperature stimulated quality changes in peeled shallots.

Treatment
High storage temperaturee1
Outcome
quality changese1
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“High storage temperature stimulated quality changes in the shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour released from the sachet accumulated in the active package headspace.

Treatment
ethanol vapour-controlled release sachete2
Outcome
ethanol vapour accumulated in the active package headspacee3
Direction
accumulatede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“incorporating an ethanol vapour-controlled release sachet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–273 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although ethanol vapour accumulated in the active package headspace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol concentrations within the shallots were not significantly different from those in control packages.

Treatment
ethanol vapour-controlled release sachete2
Outcome
ethanol concentrationse4
Direction
not significantly differente4
Comparator
control packagese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“incorporating an ethanol vapour-controlled release sachet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–273 · show in text ↑
e4

“the extent to which ethanol concentrations increased within the shallots was not significantly different from that in the control packages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour from the LDPE sachet combined with 10 °C could delay yeast and mould proliferation in shallots.

Treatment
ethanol vapour released from the low-density polyethylene sachete5
Interactor
yeast and moulde5other
Outcome
Microbial proliferatione5
Direction
delayede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“Microbial proliferation in terms of yeast and mould counts could be delayed through a combination of 10 ℃ and ethanol vapour released from the low-density polyethylene sachet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour accumulated in the packages had no significant effect on mass loss, firmness or colour change of peeled shallots.

Treatment
ethanol vapour accumulated in the packagese6
Outcome
mass loss, firmness, and colour changese6
Direction
did not have a significant effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e6

“The ethanol vapour accumulated in the packages did not have a significant effect on mass loss, firmness, and colour changes in the peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour accumulated in the packages had no significant effect on oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in the packages.

Treatment
ethanol vapour accumulated in the packagese6
Outcome
concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the packagese7
Direction
did not have a significant effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“freshly peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e6

“The ethanol vapour accumulated in the packages did not have a significant effect on mass loss, firmness, and colour changes in the peeled shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1353 · show in text ↑
e7

“or on the concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the packages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1424 · show in text ↑

ethanol · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ethanol · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.