Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The Effect of Curing and Leaves Cutting in Longterm Storage of Shallot

M Kusmali; U Ahmad; E Darmawati

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Shallot is important as one of the spices for cooking various foods, as raw materials for the food industry, and as one of the ingredients for Indonesian traditional herbs. Postharvest handling is needed to extend its shelf life and to maintain its quality during storage. The aims of this research are: 1) to evaluate the effect of curing and leaves cutting on the quality changes of shallots during storage, and 2) to get the best pre-storage procedure in maintaining the quality of shallots during storage. Shallots leaves were cut before drying while the others are stored with leaves as control. Then, half of the samples were cured for three days, and sundried for four days, while other samples were sundried directly for seven days without curing them first. Then samples were stored for 16 weeks in two different conditions. The results showed that the treatment of curing without leaves cutting and stored at 5°C with 65-70% RH gave the best quality than other treatments. It could minimize damage and weight loss, maintaining hardness, color, and important ingredients until 12 weeks of storage. However, there were drastic decreases in some quality parameters, 32.0% damage and 38.7% weight loss after 16 weeks of storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curing without leaf cutting at 5°C and 65-70% RH gave the best shallot quality among treatments.

Treatment
curing without leaves cutting and stored at 5°C with 65-70% RHe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the treatment of curing without leaves cutting and stored at 5°C with 65-70% RH gave the best quality than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment minimized shallot damage and weight loss through 12 weeks of storage.

Outcome
damage and weight losse0
Direction
minimizee0
Qualifier
until 12 weeks of storagee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It could minimize damage and weight loss, maintaining hardness, color, and important ingredients until 12 weeks of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment maintained shallot hardness, color and important ingredients through 12 weeks.

Outcome
hardness, color, and important ingredientse0
Qualifier
until 12 weeks of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining hardness, color, and important ingredients until 12 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage reached 32.0% after 16 weeks of shallot storage.

Outcome
damagee0
Value
32.0%e0
Qualifier
after 16 weeks of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“32.0% damage and 38.7% weight loss after 16 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight loss reached 38.7% after 16 weeks of shallot storage.

Outcome
weight losse0
Value
38.7%e0
Qualifier
after 16 weeks of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“32.0% damage and 38.7% weight loss after 16 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.