Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS) of Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 and Its Roles in Legume Symbiosis and Rice Endophytic Association

Pongpan Songwattana; Rujirek Noisangiam; Kamonluck Teamtisong; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
44
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 strain isolated from a paddy field has the ability to nodulate a wide spectrum of legumes. Unlike other bradyrhizobia, this strain has a symbiotic plasmid harboring nod, nif and T3SS genes. This T3SS cluster contains all the genes necessary for the formation of the secretory apparatus and the transcriptional activator (TtsI), which is preceded by a nod-box motif. An in silico search predicted 14 effectors putatively translocated by this T3SS machinery. In this study, we explored the role of the T3SS in the symbiotic performance of DOA9 by evaluating the ability of a T3SS mutant (ΩrhcN) to nodulate legumes belonging to Dalbergioid, Millettioid and Genistoid tribes. Among the nine species tested, four (Arachis hypogea, Vigna radiata, Crotalaria juncea, Macroptilium atropurpureum) responded positively to the rhcN mutation (ranging from suppression of plant defense reactions, an increase in the number of nodules and a dramatic improvement in nodule development and infection), one (Stylosanthes hamata) responded negatively (fewer nodules and less nitrogen fixation) and four species (Aeschynomene americana, Aeschynomene afraspera, Indigofera tinctoria and Desmodium tortuosum) displayed no phenotype. We also tested the role of the T3SS in the ability of the DOA9 strain to endophytically colonize rice roots, but detected no effect of the T3SS mutation, in contrast to what was previously reported in the Bradyrhizobium SUTN9-2 strain. Taken together, these data indicate that DOA9 contains a functional T3SS that interferes with the ability of the strain to interact symbiotically with legumes but not with rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four legume species responded positively to rhcN mutation.

Taxon
Arachis hypogea, Vigna radiata, Crotalaria juncea, Macroptilium atropurpureume0
Treatment
rhcN mutatione0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9t0symbiont
Outcome
responded positivelye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four (Arachis hypogea, Vigna radiata, Crotalaria juncea, Macroptilium atropurpureum) responded positively to the rhcN mutation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stylosanthes hamata had fewer nodules with rhcN mutation.

Taxon
Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9t0symbiont
Outcome
nodulese0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes hamata
Stylosanthes hamata · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one (Stylosanthes hamata) responded negatively (fewer nodules and less nitrogen fixation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stylosanthes hamata had less nitrogen fixation with rhcN mutation.

Taxon
Stylosanthes hamataStylosanthes hamatae0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9t0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes hamata
Stylosanthes hamata · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one (Stylosanthes hamata) responded negatively (fewer nodules and less nitrogen fixation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four legume species displayed no phenotype.

Taxon
Aeschynomene americana, Aeschynomene afraspera, Indigofera tinctoria and Desmodium tortuosumAeschynomene americanaIndigofera tinctoriaAeschynomene afrasperaDesmodium tortuosume0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9t0symbiont
Outcome
no phenotypee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aeschynomene americana
Aeschynomene americana · TaxonRobert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Courtesy of USD · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Indigofera tinctoria
Indigofera tinctoria · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Desmodium tortuosum
Desmodium tortuosum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9
Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four species (Aeschynomene americana, Aeschynomene afraspera, Indigofera tinctoria and Desmodium tortuosum) displayed no phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3SS mutation had no effect on rice root colonization.

Treatment
T3SS mutatione0
Interactor
DOA9 straine0symbiont
Outcome
endophytically colonize rice rootse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ability of the DOA9 strain to endophytically colonize rice roots, but detected no effect of the T3SS mutation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1393 · show in text ↑

loss of function · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.