Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi (winter) season of 2014–15 and 2015–16 at Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad, Karnataka, India to evaluate the efficacy of tank mix herbicides and premix herbicides on weed control and its influence on productivity and profitability in irrigated wheat. Tank mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha recorded significantly higher grain yield (4.31 t/ha) followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (4.15 t/ha) over weedy check. Biological yield was recorded significantly higher with clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (12.21 t/ha) followed by sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha (12.18 t/ha) over 2,4-D 2.5 kg/ha (10.68 t/ha) alone. The lower weed density, weed biomass and higher weed control efficiency was recorded with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha compared to weedy check. The more gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio was obtained with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha over other weed management practices.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron at 25 + 4 g/ha significantly increased wheat grain yield to 4.31 t/ha over weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.31 t/hae0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tank mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha recorded significantly higher grain yield (4.31 t/ha) followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (4.15 t/ha) over weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus metsulfuron at 60 + 4 g/ha significantly increased grain yield to 4.15 t/ha over weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.15 t/hae0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tank mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha recorded significantly higher grain yield (4.31 t/ha) followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (4.15 t/ha) over weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus metsulfuron significantly raised biological yield to 12.21 t/ha compared with 2,4-D alone.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/hae0
- Outcome
- Biological yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.21 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2.5 kg/ha (10.68 t/ha) alonee0
- Comparator
- 2,4-De0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biological yield was recorded significantly higher with clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (12.21 t/ha) followed by sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha (12.18 t/ha) over 2,4-D 2.5 kg/ha (10.68 t/ha) alone.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron significantly raised biological yield to 12.18 t/ha compared with 2,4-D alone.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/hae0
- Outcome
- Biological yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.18 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2.5 kg/ha (10.68 t/ha) alonee0
- Comparator
- 2,4-De0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biological yield was recorded significantly higher with clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha (12.21 t/ha) followed by sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha (12.18 t/ha) over 2,4-D 2.5 kg/ha (10.68 t/ha) alone.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron lowered weed density and biomass relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/hae0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed density, weed biomasse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower weed density, weed biomass and higher weed control efficiency was recorded with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha compared to weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus metsulfuron lowered weed density and biomass relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/hae0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed density, weed biomasse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower weed density, weed biomass and higher weed control efficiency was recorded with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha compared to weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron increased weed control efficiency relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/hae0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower weed density, weed biomass and higher weed control efficiency was recorded with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha compared to weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus metsulfuron increased weed control efficiency relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/hae0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lower weed density, weed biomass and higher weed control efficiency was recorded with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4 g/ha compared to weedy check.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron produced greater gross returns, net returns and benefit:cost ratio than other weed management practices.
- Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/hae0
- Outcome
- gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other weed management practicese0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The more gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio was obtained with sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 25 + 4 g/ha over other weed management practices.”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
130 papers more in this group
See all 134 papers →metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
151 papers more in this group
See all 155 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.