Abstract
Environmental pollution and high costs of mineral fertilization have impelled scientists and farmers to use environmentally friendly fertilizers. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different combinations of rabbit manure (RM), rock phosphate (RH), feldspar (F), and bio-fertilizers [Microbine (Bio-N), Phosphorin (Bio-P) and Potassiumag (Bio-K)] on the growth, yield, and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants. The mixture of RM, RH, and F + Bio-N-P-K increased the tomato fruit yield by 30% compared to inorganic fertilization. The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculation increased the concentration of N, P, and K in the leaves of tomato by 34%, 35%, and 50% in comparison to the same treatment without the bio-fertilizer. The current study clearly depicted that natural minerals (RH and F) and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium bio-fertilization lead to higher yields and better fruit quality than conventional fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The organic mineral and biofertilizer mixture increased tomato fruit yield by 30% compared with inorganic fertilization.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- The mixture of RM, RH, and F + Bio-N-P-Ke0
- Outcome
- tomato fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 30%e0
- Comparator
- inorganic fertilizatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mixture of RM, RH, and F + Bio-N-P-K increased the tomato fruit yield by 30% compared to inorganic fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer inoculation raised tomato leaf N concentration by 34% relative to the same treatment without biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculatione0
- Outcome
- concentration of Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 34%e0
- Comparator
- the same treatment without the bio-fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculation increased the concentration of N, P, and K in the leaves of tomato by 34%, 35%, and 50% in comparison to the same treatment without the bio-fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer inoculation raised tomato leaf P concentration by 35% relative to the same treatment without biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculatione0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 35%e0
- Comparator
- the same treatment without the bio-fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculation increased the concentration of N, P, and K in the leaves of tomato by 34%, 35%, and 50% in comparison to the same treatment without the bio-fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer inoculation raised tomato leaf K concentration by 50% relative to the same treatment without biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculatione0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 50%e0
- Comparator
- the same treatment without the bio-fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of RM, RH, and F with the bio-fertilizer (Bio-N-P-K) inoculation increased the concentration of N, P, and K in the leaves of tomato by 34%, 35%, and 50% in comparison to the same treatment without the bio-fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural minerals and NPK biofertilization produced better fruit quality than conventional fertilization.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- natural minerals (RH and F) and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium bio-fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“natural minerals (RH and F) and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium bio-fertilization lead to higher yields and better fruit quality than conventional fertilization”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
97 papers more in this group
See all 101 papers →inoculation · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.