Abstract
An experiment was conducted under field conditions to observe the effect of bio-agents, botanicals and fungicide against Phytophthora infestans. Seven treatments were taken up with three replications and data collected was analyzed using randomized block design (RBD). Two botanicals (Neem extract and Garlic extract), three bio-control agents (Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and treated control were used. Minimum disease intensity percent and maximum production of tomato was recorded in treatment P. fluorescens@5g/l (33.30% and 223.10 q/ha, respectively) followed by T. viride @5g/l (34.79% and 213.36 q/ha, respectively), as compared to treated control (30.80% and 244.50 q/ha) and untreated control (55.88% and 103.50 q/ha). P. fluorescens was found significantly superior over other treatments. In other parameters, plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively) shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively) was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens treatment had 33.30% disease intensity.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- P. fluorescens@5g/le0
- Interactor
- P. fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- disease intensity percente0
- Direction
- Minimume0
- Value
- 33.30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Minimum disease intensity percent and maximum production of tomato was recorded in treatment P. fluorescens@5g/l (33.30% and 223.10 q/ha, respectively)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens treatment produced 223.10 q/ha of tomato.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens@5g/le0
- Interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- production of tomatoe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 223.10 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum production of tomato was recorded in treatment P. fluorescens@5g/l (33.30% and 223.10 q/ha, respectively)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride treatment had 34.79% disease intensity.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viride @5g/le0
- Interactor
- T. viride
Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- disease intensity percente1
- Value
- 34.79%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by T. viride @5g/l (34.79% and 213.36 q/ha, respectively)”
e1“disease intensity percent”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride treatment produced 213.36 q/ha of tomato.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viride @5g/le0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- production of tomatoe1
- Value
- 213.36 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by T. viride @5g/l (34.79% and 213.36 q/ha, respectively)”
e1“production of tomato”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P. fluorescens was significantly superior to other treatments.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescense0
- Interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- significantly superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P. fluorescens was found significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported plant height at 62.41cm.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 62.41cme0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported fresh shoot weight at 53.30 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- fresh shoot weighte0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 53.30 ge0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported fresh root weight at 7.02 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- fresh root weighte0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 7.02 ge0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported root length at 22.02 cm.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 22.02 cme0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported dry shoot weight at 8.28 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- dry shoot weighte0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 8.28 ge0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride had the best reported dry root weight at 4.70 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- dry root weighte0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Value
- 4.70 ge0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), fresh shoot weight (g), fresh root weight (g), root length (cm), dry shoot weight(g) and dry root weight (g)of T. viride (62.41cm, 53.30 g, 7.02 g, 22.02 cm, 8.28 g and 4.70 g respectively)”
e1“was found(best treatment) and was significantly superior over other treatments.”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma viride · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Trichoderma viride · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Trichoderma viride · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.